A Case for High-Fidelity Material Response Modeling

Material response modeling of heatshields for planetary entry vehicles has remained largely unchanged since Aerotherm Corp. introduced the CMA program in 1967. Modern models, like FIAT, have tread the same path, introducing efficiencies and better material property data along the way, but otherwise following the same underlying model paradigm. The CMA approach has worked well for heatshield design up to this point. However, there are three motivations for the material response community to pursue higher fidelity beyond simplified, CMA-derived models. The first motivation is that missions are becoming increasingly demanding and complex and, as they do, confidence in simplified models naturally decreases. Second, reliability of materials is now as much or more of a driving concern for mission designers than thermal response. Third, NASA and other agencies are increasingly interested in flight instrumentation for engineering science. This latter motivation places far stricter requirements on model accuracy in order to meet requirements for flight environment reconstruction.