NASA Logo

NTRS

NTRS - NASA Technical Reports Server

Press Enter or click the Search button to begin your search.

Back to Results
Coordination Between Sectors in Shared Airspace OperationsRecent studies have shown that a more efficient use of airspace may involve shared airspace operations, i.e., temporal as well as spatial separation of arrival and departure flows [1][2]. Temporal separation would permit a departure aircraft to fly through an arrival flow, depending on an available gap. This would necessitate careful and precise coordination between controllers in different sectors. Three methods of coordination which permit the penetration of a controller's airspace by another controller's aircraft are described: point out, look-and-go, and prearranged coordination procedure. Requirements of each method are given, along with associated problems that have surfaced in the field as described by Aviation Safety and Reporting System (ASRS) and other reports. A Human-in-the-Loop simulation was designed to compare two of the methods: point out and prearranged coordination procedures. In prearranged coordination procedures (P-ACP), the controllers control an aircraft in another controller's airspace according to specified prearranged procedures, without coordinating each individual aircraft with another controller, as is done with point outs. In the simulation, three experienced controllers rotated through two arrival sectors and a non-involved arrival sector of a Terminal Radar Approach Control (TRACON) airspace. Results of eighteen one-hour simulation runs (nine in each of the two conditions) showed no impact of the coordination method on separation violations nor on arrival times for 208 departing aircraft crossing an arrival stream. Participant assessment indicated that although both coordination conditions were acceptable, the prearranged coordination procedure condition was slightly safer, more efficient, timely, and overall, worked better operationally. Problems arose in the point out condition regarding controllers noticing acceptance of point outs. Also, in about half of the point-out runs, time pressure was felt to have had an impact on when and if the departures could cross an arrival stream. An additional problem with point outs may be confusion in the field about which controller has responsibility for separating point-out aircraft from other aircraft.
Document ID
20190001781
Acquisition Source
Ames Research Center
Document Type
Conference Paper
Authors
Parke, Bonny
(San Jose State Univ. Moffett Field, CA, United States)
Chevalley, Eric
(San Jose State Univ. Moffett Field, CA, United States)
Lee, Paul
(San Jose State Univ. Moffett Field, CA, United States)
Omar, Faisal
(San Jose State Univ. Moffett Field, CA, United States)
Kraut, Joshua M.
(San Jose State Univ. Moffett Field, CA, United States)
Gonter, Kari
(San Jose State Univ. Moffett Field, CA, United States)
Borade, Abhay
(San Jose State Univ. Moffett Field, CA, United States)
Gabriel, Conrad
(San Jose State Univ. Moffett Field, CA, United States)
Bienert, Nancy
(San Jose State Univ. Moffett Field, CA, United States)
Lin, Cindy
(San Jose State Univ. Moffett Field, CA, United States)
Yoo, Hyo-Sang
(San Jose State Univ. Moffett Field, CA, United States)
Palmer, Everett
(NASA Ames Research Center Moffett Field, CA, United States)
Date Acquired
March 22, 2019
Publication Date
October 5, 2014
Subject Category
Air Transportation And Safety
Report/Patent Number
ARC-E-DAA-TN17699
Report Number: ARC-E-DAA-TN17699
Meeting Information
Meeting: Digital Avionics Systems Conference
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Country: United States
Start Date: October 5, 2014
End Date: October 9, 2014
Sponsors: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers
Funding Number(s)
WBS: WBS 411931.02.01.01.13.06
CONTRACT_GRANT: NNX12AB08A
Distribution Limits
Public
Copyright
Public Use Permitted.
No Preview Available