NASA Logo

NTRS

NTRS - NASA Technical Reports Server

Back to Results
Flight Deck Surface Trajectory-Based Operations (STBO): A Four-Dimensional Trajectory (4DT) SimulationIn four-dimensional trajectory (4DT) Surface Trajectory-Based Operations (STBO), aircraft are assigned a conflict-free 4DT which defines an expected location (x,y coordinates) at all times, t, along the taxi route (with altitude, being fixed). These 4DTs afford the highest temporal certainty at all points along the taxi route, and at the departure runway. In the present study, a 4DT flight deck display was presented on the Airport Moving Map (AMM) to support pilot conformance to a 4DT clearance while taxiing under manual control. This pilot-in-the-loop simulation compared the effect of 4DT flight deck display formats on distance from the expected 4DT location, conformance to the displayed tolerance band, eyes-out time, and pilot ratings of safety and workload. In the defined-tolerance display format, a graphical representation of the expected 4DT location, with a distance-based allowable-tolerance band, was depicted on the AMM. Two defined-tolerance band sizes were tested: plus or minus 164 feet and plus or minus 405 feet. In the undefined-tolerance display format, the expected 4DT location was displayed graphically on the AMM, with no indicated allowable-tolerance bounds. Each taxi trial included 4DT speed changes (two or five, per trial) and a range of 4DT taxi speeds. Results showed that the larger (plus or minus 405 feet) defined-tolerance band yielded higher conformance levels than the smaller (plus or minus 164 feet) band, with pilots staying within the specified and displayed conformance bounds more in the larger (99.71%) than the smaller defined-tolerance band (93.37 percent). However, in terms of being able to predict the location of the aircraft compared to the expected 4DT location, the smaller defined-tolerance band resulted in pilots keeping their aircraft closer to the 4DT location, for both average distance and for a given confidence interval (e.g., 95 percent), than either the larger defined-tolerance band or the undefined-tolerance display format. The larger tolerance band yielded more “eyes-out-the-window” time than the smaller tolerance band. Pilots also rated taxing with the larger tolerance band as safer than the smaller tolerance band.
Document ID
20190025159
Acquisition Source
Ames Research Center
Document Type
Conference Paper
Authors
Bakowski, Deborah L.
(San Jose State Univ. Moffett Field, CA, United States)
Hooey, Becky L.
(NASA Ames Research Center Moffett Field, CA, United States)
Foyle, David C.
(NASA Ames Research Center Moffett Field, CA, United States)
Date Acquired
May 16, 2019
Publication Date
September 17, 2017
Subject Category
Aircraft Communications And Navigation
Report/Patent Number
ARC-E-DAA-TN45644
Meeting Information
Meeting: IEEE/AIAA Digital Avionics System Conference (DASC 2017)
Location: St. Petersburg, FL
Country: United States
Start Date: September 17, 2017
End Date: September 21, 2017
Sponsors: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA), Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers
Funding Number(s)
CONTRACT_GRANT: NNX12AB08A
WBS: 330693.04.20.01.05
Distribution Limits
Public
Copyright
Public Use Permitted.
Technical Review
NASA Peer Committee
Keywords
STBO
Four-Dimensional Trajectory (4DT)
Flight Deck
No Preview Available