Comparing Level-2 and Level-3 Satellite Ocean Color Retrieval Validation Methodologies

Many ocean color data applications leverage global spatially composited Level-3(L3) satellite data, because of their regular Earth-grid frame of reference. However, ocean color satellite retrieval performance is routinely evaluated on Level-2 (L2) data at the native satellite swath resolution and geometries. This study assesses how accurately binned and gridded L3 data represent L2 satellite data products via satellite-to-in situ match-up activities.L2 and L3 satellite data retrievals of the photosynthetic pigment chlorophyll-a are compared with a common in situ data set, revealing similar L2 and L3 satellite-to-in situ performance for both MODIS-Aqua and VIIRS-SNPP. This agreement implies that L2 validation results are generally applicable to L3 data. However, uncertainties are introduced during the generation of L3 data from L2 data. L3 data comparisons introduce a wider temporal window between the time of in situ measurement and the time of the satellite observation, which can unintentionally reflect on the quality of the satellite retrieval or algorithm performance. The choice of L3 map projection may introduce additional uncertainty by spatially distorting the true location of the satellite retrievals. Each manipulation of satellite data beyond theinstrument's native spatio temporal reference (L2) reduces the applicability of L2 validation results to higher data processing levels.