NASA Logo

NTRS

NTRS - NASA Technical Reports Server

Press Enter or click the Search button to begin your search.

Back to Results
Electron Energy Partition Across Interplanetary Shocks. III. AnalysisAn analysis of model fit results of 15,210 electron velocity distribution functions (VDFs), observed within ±2 hr of 52 interplanetary (IP) shocks by the Wind spacecraft near 1 au, is presented as the third and final part on electron VDFs near IP shocks. The core electrons and protons dominate in the magnitude and change in the partialto-total thermal pressure ratio, with the core electrons often gaining as much or more than the protons. Only a moderate positive correlation is observed between the electron temperature and the kinetic energy change across the shock, while weaker, if any, correlations were found with any other macroscopic shock parameter. No VDF parameter correlated with the shock normal angle. The electron VDF evolves from a narrowly peaked core with flaring suprathermal tails in the upstream to either a slightly hotter core with steeper tails or much hotter flattop core with even steeper tails downstream of the weaker and strongest shocks, respectively. Both quasi-static and fluctuating fields are examined as possible mechanisms modifying the VDF, but neither is sufficient alone. For instance, flattop VDFs can be generated by nonlinear ion acoustic wave stochastic acceleration (i.e., inelastic collisions), while other work suggested they result from the combination of quasi-static and fluctuating fields. This three-part study shows that not only are these systems not thermodynamic in nature; even kinetic models may require modification to include things like inelastic collision operators to properly model electron VDF evolution across shocks or in the solar wind.
Document ID
20205000700
Acquisition Source
Goddard Space Flight Center
Document Type
Reprint (Version printed in journal)
Authors
Lynn B. Wilson Iii
(Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt, Maryland, United States)
Li-jen Chen ORCID
(Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt, Maryland, United States)
Shan Wang
(University of Maryland, College Park College Park, Maryland, United States)
Steven J. Schwartz
(University of Colorado Boulder Boulder, Colorado, United States)
Drew L. Turner
(Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory North Laurel, Maryland, United States)
Michael L. Stevens
(Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States)
Justin C Kasper ORCID
(Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Lab North Laurel, Maryland, United States)
Adnane Osmane
(University of Helsinki Helsinki, Finland)
Damiano Caprioli ORCID
(ARC-NAS-HECC Chicago, Illinois, United States)
Stuart D. Bale
(University of California, Berkeley Berkeley, California, United States)
Marc P Pulupa ORCID
(Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Lab Berkeley, California, United States)
Chadi S. Salem
(University of California, Berkeley Berkeley, California, United States)
Katherine A. Goodrich
(University of California, Berkeley Berkeley, California, United States)
Date Acquired
April 9, 2020
Publication Date
April 9, 2020
Publication Information
Publication: The Astrophysical Journal
Publisher: American Astronomical Society
Volume: 893
Issue: 1
Issue Publication Date: April 10, 2020
ISSN: 0004-637X
e-ISSN: 1538-4357
Subject Category
Astrophysics
Funding Number(s)
WBS: 791926.02.06.01.07.11
Distribution Limits
Public
Copyright
Use by or on behalf of the US Gov. Permitted.
Technical Review
External Peer Committee
Keywords
Solar wind
Interplanetary shocks
Solar coronal mass ejections
Solar coronal mass ejection shocks
Space plasmas
Plasma astrophysics
Plasma physics
Interplanetary particle acceleration
No Preview Available