CFD Simulation of an Inward-Turning Supersonic Inlet Unstart at Flight Mach Number 1.7

Interest in inward-turning supersonic inlets renewed during NASA’s Commercial Supersonic Technology Project, as a means of reducing disturbances caused by propulsion integration. Inward-turning designs have the potential to greatly reduce the strength of shock waves emanating outward from the nacelle, and therefore their contribution to the overall sonic boom signature. For top-mounted, or over-wing installations, disturbances to aircraft aerodynamics are reduced. The nature of the inward-turning geometry results in a boundary-layer thickening effect, opposite that of the familiar thinning of an outward-turning cone boundary-layer. The application of a small amount of boundary-layer bleed at the throat has been shown to alleviate the negative effects of the boundary-layer on subsonic diffuser performance. Boundary-layer bleed, however, comes at the expense of increased complexity, and external disturbances at bleed exits that would partially defeat the purpose of the inward-turning scheme. Vortex generators were proposed as an alternative to bleed, and an initial CFD study of their effectiveness in this application forms the basis of the present work. A source-term model in the Wind-US CFD code was used to model the effects of an array of vortex generators placed at the entrance to the subsonic diffuser. Baseline results with no vortex generators compared favorably to previously reported results with no bleed at back-pressures near the design point, but stability margin in the present case was limited by a curious non-linear phenomena similar to unstart in mixed-compression inlets. While some improvement was noted with vortex generators, their effectiveness was diminished by the limited stability margin. A time-accurate calculation was subsequently performed to better understand this process. Results of this calculation are presented and instantaneous solutions compared with steady-state, subcritical results previously reported. The stability margin limitation is attributed to the use of a constant-pressure outflow boundary condition, which differed from that used in the prior simulations.