JPSS-1 ATMS Post-launch Active Geolocation Analysis

A NOAA-20 (N20) ATMS active geolocation test was performed around Jan. 2018 with 24 pre-selected coastline crossing scenes. After comprehensive analysis of ATMS stare data and the corresponding VIIRS data, the ATMS pitch, roll and yaw pointing angle errors are found from the nadir perpendicular, the nadir oblique shallow angle, and the off-nadir perpendicular coastline crossing data, respectively. In this study, we first determine the ATMS radiometric coastline crossing time by using the ATMS radiometric count data. Since the coastline can be located anywhere within one ATMS FOV from the passive (regular scanning) geolocation data, depending on the scan starting time, it is not a valid assumption for the inflection point being the same as the coastline location. Consequently, using the passive geolocation data to validate the sensor’s on-orbit pointing angle performance is limited. After finding the ATMS radiometric coastline crossing time from the ATMS data, we compare it with the VIIRS effective time stamp (see main text). Specifically the VIIRS M3, M4 & M5 (true color) & M15 and M16 bands (thermal) data have a much smaller footprint size. Using the differences of the ATMS and VIIRS (effective) coastlines crossing times, the N20 ATMS pitch, roll and yaw pointing angle errors are found to be -0.09o, -0.24o and 0.28o, respectively. To determine ATMS geolocation properly, these on-orbit pointing errors need to be corrected, adding to the ATMS SDR Processing Coefficient Table, and passed on to the operational geolocation processing code.