NASA Logo

NTRS

NTRS - NASA Technical Reports Server

Back to Results
ICESat-2 Pointing Calibration and Geolocation PerformanceICESat-2 science requirements are dependent on the accurate real-time pointing control (i.e. geolocation control) and post-processed geolocation knowledge of the laser altimeter surface returns. Pre-launch pointing alignment errors and post-launch pointing alignment variation result in large geolocation errors that must be calibrated on orbit. In addition, the changing sun-orbit geometry causes thermal-mechanical forced laser frame alignment variations at the orbit period and trends from days, weeks and months. Early mission analysis computed precise post-launch laser beam alignment calibration. The alignment calibration was uploaded to the spacecraft and enabled the pointing control performance to achieve 4.4 ± 6.0 m, a significant improvement over the 45 m (1 σ) mission requirement. Laser frame alignment calibrations are used to reduce the alignment bias and time variation, as well as the orbital variation contributions to geolocation knowledge error from 6 m to 1.7 m (1 σ). Relative beam alignment of the six beams is calibrated and shown to contribute between 0.5 ± 0.1 m and 2.4 ± 0.2 m of remaining geolocation knowledge error. Independent geolocation assessment based on comparison to high-resolution digital elevation models agrees well with the calibration geolocation error estimates. The analysis demonstrates the ICESat-2 mission is performing far better than its geolocation knowledge requirement of 6.5 m (1 σ) after the laser frame alignment bias variation and orbital variation calibrations have been applied. Remaining geolocation error is beam dependent and ranges from 2.5 m for beam 6 to 4.4 m for beam 2 (mean + 1 σ).
Document ID
20210009921
Acquisition Source
Goddard Space Flight Center
Document Type
Accepted Manuscript (Version with final changes)
Authors
S. B. Luthcke ORCID
(Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt, Maryland, United States)
T. C. Thomas ORCID
(Emergent Space Technologies (United States) Greenbelt, Maryland, United States)
T. A. Pennington
(Stinger Ghaffarian Technologies (United States) Greenbelt, Maryland, United States)
T. W. Rebold
(Emergent Space Technologies (United States) Greenbelt, Maryland, United States)
J. B. Nicholas
(Emergent Space Technologies (United States) Greenbelt, Maryland, United States)
D. D. Rowlands
(Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt, Maryland, United States)
A. S. Gardner ORCID
(Jet Propulsion Lab La Cañada Flintridge, California, United States)
S. Bae
(The University of Texas at Austin Austin, Texas, United States)
Date Acquired
February 8, 2021
Publication Date
February 7, 2021
Publication Information
Publication: Earth and Space Sciences
Publisher: American Geophysical Union / Wiley Open Access
Volume: 8
Issue: 3
Issue Publication Date: March 1, 2021
e-ISSN: 2333-5084
Subject Category
Geosciences (General)
Space Sciences (General)
Funding Number(s)
WBS: 306615.06.01.10
CONTRACT_GRANT: NSF-OPP 1043681
CONTRACT_GRANT: NSF-OPP 1559691
CONTRACT_GRANT: NSF-OPP 1542736
Distribution Limits
Public
Copyright
Public Use Permitted.
Technical Review
Single Expert
No Preview Available