Toward Relating Open- and Closed-Test Section Microphone Phased Array Aeroacoustic Measurements

Aeroacoustic measurements utilizing microphone phased arrays are becoming more commonplace in large-scale wind tunnels. However, for such costly tests it is difficult to assess the influence of a given facility's configuration on the acquired data. One such opportunity has recently arisen in the NASA Langley Research Center 14- by 22-Foot Subsonic Tunnel, where the High-Lift configuration of the Common Research Model was tested in both open-jet and closed wall configurations. Acoustic data were acquired on the same model with the same specific hardware at the same Mach number; and for similar model angles of attack, array apertures, and array angles relative to the model location. Initial deconvolution comparisons using DAMAS appear poor. The closed test section results show contamination likely due to background noise and reflections. The open-jet results show severe blurring due to the decorrelation of acoustic waves passing through a turbulent free shear layer. However, accounting for image sources in the DAMAS grid reduces visual artifacts in the closed test section results, and a preliminary coherence correction technique mitigates the blurring in the open-jet results. Qualitatively, both tests identify similar source behavior. Quantitatively, summed spectra of the slat noise agree in some frequency bands but differ in others. Proposals that may mitigate the difference are given for each configuration, such as correcting for the array protective cover and applying background subtraction in the closed wall configuration, and further developing the coherence loss correction for deconvolution methods in the open-jet setup.