NASA Logo

NTRS

NTRS - NASA Technical Reports Server

Back to Results
Strategic and Tactical Functions in an Autonomous Air Traffic Management SystemThis paper evaluates, by means of fast-time simulation, performance of a candidate system for autonomous air traffic management. Advancing towards autonomy in air traffic management may be necessary in order for new air vehicle types such as electric Vertical Take Off and Landing (eVTOL) to operate safely and efficiently in airspace shared with conventional traffic. To account for uncertain prediction, autonomous air traffic management was divided into two integrated and coordinated subsystems: strategic scheduling, performed at predeparture, and tactical conflict detection and resolution, performed throughout the flight. The conflict detection and resolution subsystem contained a second tactical scheduling function that applied to flights operating in the airspace near the destination airport. This paper compares and contrasts the two subsystems and uses fast-time simulation to demonstrate the comparisons. A scenario of 54 flights inbound to Newark Liberty International Airport was simulated multiple times with different parameters. The scenario was created using flight plans recorded from the National Airspace System on a low weather, average traffic day in April 2018. Whereas the routes were not changed, the departure times of the flights were modified to increase arrival rates at the Newark runway and arrival meter fixes. Results of the simulations showed that the autonomous air traffic management system was able to safely manage the traffic, even with prediction uncertainty. In addition, they showed the importance of including flight holding maneuvers, in addition to path stretching, in conflict detection and resolution and of coordinating strategic and tactical scheduling. Finally, a tradeoff between absorbing the delay calculated by strategic scheduling on the ground versus in the air showed that taking most of the delay on the ground is cost effective for a simple idealized cost function. However, taking a little of the delay in the air prevented throughput on the runway from dropping for short periods due to trajectory prediction uncertainty.
Document ID
20210016859
Acquisition Source
Ames Research Center
Document Type
Conference Paper
Authors
Robert Windhorst
(Ames Research Center Mountain View, California, United States)
Todd Lauderdale
(Ames Research Center Mountain View, California, United States)
Alexander Sadovsky
(Ames Research Center Mountain View, California, United States)
James Phillips
(Universities Space Research Association Columbia, Maryland, United States)
Yung-cheng Chu
(Universities Space Research Association Columbia, Maryland, United States)
Date Acquired
June 2, 2021
Subject Category
Air Transportation And Safety
Meeting Information
Meeting: AIAA Aviation and Aeronautics Forum and Exposition (2021 AIAA AVIATION Forum)
Location: Virtual
Country: US
Start Date: August 2, 2021
End Date: August 6, 2021
Sponsors: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics
Funding Number(s)
CONTRACT_GRANT: NNA16BD14C
Distribution Limits
Public
Copyright
Public Use Permitted.
Technical Review
NASA Technical Management
Keywords
air traffic control
autonomous systems
scheduling
No Preview Available