Evaluation of CFD as a Surrogate for Mach 2.4 to 4.6 Wind-Tunnel Testing – Project Overview

The debate over when wind-tunnel testing will be replaced by Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) comes and goes. More recently the debate has subsided with a more collaborative spirit between practitioners of these two disciplines resulting in significant improvements in the outcomes of both. There may come a time, however, when CFD has sufficient accuracy to supplant WTT as the dominant or perhaps only tool for aerodynamic simulation. If and/or when that happens, financial pressures favor efforts to close or severely limit the operations of wind tunnels. Presumably additional resources will go toward CFD to generate aerodynamic databases, load environments, and new aero/fluid-dynamic knowledge. It is therefore important to develop appropriate processes by which wind-tunnel closure decisions are made to ensure that facilities critical to industry and government research and development aren’t closed prematurely without proof that the available CFD tools have sufficient accuracy and low-enough cost (and enough experts and computational facilities) to take on the traditional role of wind tunnels. This paper will describe a project intended to answer the specific question of whether CFD can replace wind-tunnel testing for the limited Mach-number range 2.4 to 4.6. The project involves wind-tunnel testing and coordinated CFD for a variety of vehicle and flow-physics types in the high-speed leg of the Unitary Plan Wind Tunnel at NASA’s Langley Research Center.