Pterodactyl: Effects of 3D Thermal Analysis on Thermal Protection System Design for a Flap Control SystemNASA’s Pterodactyl project has investigated the use of a novel multi-flap control system to facilitate precision targeting of Deployable Entry Vehicles (DEVs) during atmospheric re-entry [1]. DEVs can be folded to fit within the limiting cross-sectional area of current launch systems. Once deployed, the vehicle expands and settles into a pre-determined blunt body shape. While DEVs provide a more efficient solution to increased payload sizes, the absence of a back shell does not allow for easy integration of reaction control systems, which have historically been used for guidance and control (G&C) of rigid aeroshells during entry. One DEV solution, called the Adaptable, Deployable Entry Placement Technology (ADEPT), employs mechanically deployed gores. This provided the Pterodactyl project with the opportunity to incorporate a rib-mounted, 8-flap control system for G&C. Each flap can deflect independently in and out of the hypersonic flow, requiring TPS for the flaps. Previous work within the Pterodactyl project utilized 1D thermal analysis to design the TPS. However, the Pterodactyl project was concerned that the base level tools for 1D thermal analysis were not accounting for the 3D effects of the large heating gradients along and across the flaps, the in-depth in-plane conductivity of the TPS and internal structure, and the effects of the small edge radii at the neck of the flaps. This paper discusses the methodology and results of a 3D thermal analysis of the flap control system. Additionally, the results from the 1D and 3D thermal analyses are compared. It is found that elements of the original design that resulted from the 1D analysis may be overly conservative, and implementation of a 3D thermal analysis indicated a reduction in TPS thickness is feasible. This result helps to reduce the mechanical integration complexity of the flap at the rib tip and realizes potential mass savings.
Document ID
20210025635
Acquisition Source
Ames Research Center
Document Type
Conference Paper
Authors
Sarah N D'Souza (Ames Research Center Mountain View, California, United States)
M Kathleen Mcguire (Ames Research Center Mountain View, California, United States)
Andrew Torricelli (Analytical Mechanics Associates (United States) Hampton, Virginia, United States)