NASA Logo

NTRS

NTRS - NASA Technical Reports Server

Back to Results
Simultaneous Retrieval of Selected Optical Water Quality Indicators From Landsat-8, Sentinel-2, and Sentinel-3 Constructing multi-source satellite-derived water quality (WQ) products in inland and nearshore coastal waters from the past, present, and future missions is a long-standing challenge. Despite inherent differences in sensors’ spectral capability, spatial sampling, and radiometric performance, research efforts focused on formulating, implementing, and validating universal WQ algorithms continue to evolve. This research extends a recently developed machine-learning (ML) model, i.e., Mixture Density Networks (MDNs) (Pahlevan et al., 2020; Smith et al., 2021), to the inverse problem of simultaneously retrieving WQ indicators, including chlorophyll-a (Chla), Total Suspended Solids (TSS), and the absorption by Colored Dissolved Organic Matter at 440 nm (acdom(440)), across a wide array of aquatic ecosystems. We use a database of in situ measurements to train and optimize MDN models developed for the relevant spectral measurements (400–800 nm) of the Operational Land Imager (OLI), MultiSpectral Instrument (MSI), and Ocean and Land Color Instrument (OLCI) aboard the Landsat-8, Sentinel-2, and Sentinel-3 missions, respectively. Our two performance assessment approaches, namely hold-out and leave-one-out, suggest significant, albeit varying degrees of improvements with respect to second-best algorithms, depending on the sensor and WQ indicator (e.g., 68%, 75%, 117% improvements based on the hold-out method for Chla, TSS, and acdom(440), respectively from MSI-like spectra). Using these two assessment methods, we provide theoretical upper and lower bounds on model performance when evaluating similar and/or out-of-sample datasets. To evaluate multi-mission product consistency across broad spatial scales, map products are demonstrated for three near-concurrent OLI, MSI, and OLCI acquisitions. Overall, estimated TSS and acdom(440) from these three missions are consistent within the uncertainty of the model, but Chla maps from MSI and OLCI achieve greater accuracy than those from OLI. By applying two different atmospheric correction processors to OLI and MSI images, we also conduct matchup analyses to quantify the sensitivity of the MDN model and best-practice algorithms to uncertainties in reflectance products. Our model is less or equally sensitive to these uncertainties compared to other algorithms. Recognizing their uncertainties, MDN models can be applied as a global algorithm to enable harmonized retrievals of Chla, TSS, and acdom(440) in various aquatic ecosystems from multi-source satellite imagery. Local and/or regional ML models tuned with an apt data distribution (e.g., a subset of our dataset) should nevertheless be expected to outperform our global model.
Document ID
20220004733
Acquisition Source
Goddard Space Flight Center
Document Type
Reprint (Version printed in journal)
Authors
Nima Pahlevan
(Science Systems and Applications (United States) Lanham, Maryland, United States)
Brandon Smith
(Science Systems and Applications (United States) Lanham, Maryland, United States)
Krista Alikas
(University of Tartu Tartu, Estonia)
Janet Anstee
(Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia)
Claudio Barbosa
(National Institute for Space Research São José dos Campos, Brazil)
Caren Binding
(Environment Canada Gatineau, Quebec, Canada)
Mariano Bresciani
(National Research Council Rome, Italy)
Bruno Cremella
(Université de Sherbrooke Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada)
Claudia Giardino
(National Research Council Rome, Italy)
Daniela Gurlin
(Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources Madison, Wisconsin, United States)
Virginia Fernandez
(University of the Republic Montevideo, Uruguay)
Cédric Jamet
(University of the Littoral Opal Coast Dunkirk, France)
Kersti Kangro
(University of Tartu Tartu, Estonia)
Moritz K. Lehmann
(University of Waikato Hamilton, New Zealand)
Hubert Loisel
(University of the Littoral Opal Coast Dunkirk, France)
Bunkei Matsushita
(University of Tsukuba Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan)
Nguyên Hà
(VNU University of Science Hanoi, Vietnam)
Leif Olmanson
(University of Minnesota Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States)
Geneviève Potvin
(Université de Sherbrooke Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada)
Stefan G.H. Simis
(Plymouth Marine Laboratory Plymouth, United Kingdom)
Andrea VanderWoude
(Great Lakes Environmental Research Laboratory Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States)
Vincent Vantrepotte
(University of the Littoral Opal Coast Dunkirk, France)
Antonio Ruiz-Verdù
(University of Valencia Valencia, Spain)
Date Acquired
March 23, 2022
Publication Date
January 4, 2022
Publication Information
Publication: Remote Sensing of Environment
Publisher: Elsevier
Issue: 270
Issue Publication Date: March 1, 2022
ISSN: 0034-4257
Subject Category
Earth Resources and Remote Sensing
Funding Number(s)
CONTRACT_GRANT: 80HQTR19C0015
CONTRACT_GRANT: 80GSFC20C0044
Distribution Limits
Public
Copyright
Portions of document may include copyright protected material.
Technical Review
External Peer Committee
Keywords
Machine learning
Water quality
Inland and coastal waters
OLI
MSI
OLCI
No Preview Available