NASA Logo

NTRS

NTRS - NASA Technical Reports Server

Back to Results
Quantifying Feedback from Narrow Line Region Outflows in Nearby Active Galaxies. IV. The Effects of Different Density Estimates on the Ionized Gas Masses and Outflow RatesActive galactic nuclei (AGN) can launch outflows of ionized gas that may influence galaxy evolution, and quantifying their full impact requires spatially resolved measurements of the gas masses, velocities, and radial extents. We previously reported these quantities for the ionized narrow-line region outflows in six low-redshift AGN, where the gas velocities and extents were determined from Hubble Space Telescope long-slit spectroscopy. However, calculating the gas masses required multicomponent photoionization models to account for radial variations in the gas densities, which span ∼6 orders of magnitude. To simplify this method for larger samples with less spectral coverage, we compare these gas masses with those calculated from techniques in the literature. First, we use a recombination equation with three different estimates for the radial density profiles. These include constant densities, those derived from [S ii], and power-law profiles based on constant values of the ionization parameter (U). Second, we use single-component photoionization models with power-law density profiles based on constant U, and allow U to vary with radius based on the [O iii]/Hβ ratios. We find that assuming a constant density of nH = 10(^2) cm(^−3) overestimates the gas masses for all six outflows, particularly at small radii where the outflow rates peak. The use of [S ii] marginally matches the total gas masses, but also overestimates at small radii. Overall, single-component photoionization models where U varies with radius are able to best match the gas mass and outflow rate profiles when there are insufficient emission lines to construct detailed models.
Document ID
20220005055
Acquisition Source
Goddard Space Flight Center
Document Type
Accepted Manuscript (Version with final changes)
Authors
Mitchell Revalski ORCID
(Space Telescope Science Institute Baltimore, Maryland, United States)
Michael Crenshaw ORCID
(Georgia State University Atlanta, Georgia, United States)
Marc Rafelski ORCID
(Space Telescope Science Institute Baltimore, Maryland, United States)
Steven B Kraemer ORCID
(Catholic University of America Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States)
Garrett E Polack ORCID
(Georgia State University Atlanta, Georgia, United States)
Anna Trindade Falcão ORCID
(Catholic University of America Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States)
Travis C Fischer ORCID
(Space Telescope Science Institute Baltimore, Maryland, United States)
Beena Meena ORCID
(Georgia State University Atlanta, Georgia, United States)
Francisco Martinez ORCID
(Georgia Institute of Technology Atlanta, Georgia, United States)
Henrique R Schmitt ORCID
(United States Naval Research Laboratory Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States)
Nicholas R Collins ORCID
(Telophase Corporation Arlington, Virginia, United States)
Julia Falcone ORCID
(Georgia State University Atlanta, Georgia, United States)
Date Acquired
March 29, 2022
Publication Date
March 29, 2022
Publication Information
Publication: The Astrophysical Journal
Publisher: The American Astronomical Society
Volume: 930
Issue: 1
Issue Publication Date: May 1, 2022
ISSN: 0004-637X
e-ISSN: 1538-4357
Subject Category
Astrophysics
Funding Number(s)
OTHER: NAG5-4103
CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS5-26555
CONTRACT_GRANT: 80GSFC17C0003
CONTRACT_GRANT: NNX17AC49G
CONTRACT_GRANT: DDRF-82490
Distribution Limits
Public
Copyright
Portions of document may include copyright protected material.
Technical Review
External Peer Committee
No Preview Available