A Comparison of Trajectory Refinement Schemes for GlennICE

A requirement of computational ice accretion solvers is the ability to predict the water impingement on a geometry of interest. This portion of the tool is typically implemented in an Eulerian or Lagrangian methodology with both approaches having various pros and cons. GlennICE utilizes a Lagrangian framework. For this approach to be tractable in an engineering sense, the trajectories simulated must be chosen in a more intelligent fashion than naïve uniform refinement. This paper investigates a new refinement methodology implemented in GlennICE and compares it to the previous implementation.