Trade Study Analysis of a Cryogenic Oxygen Architecture for Lunar Outpost Life Support

A trade study was performed to compare the use of cryogenic liquid oxygen (LOX) with high pressure gaseous oxygen (GOX) and electrolysis approaches for Lunar outpost life support, which consists of a surface habitat and pressurized rover. This study presents the mission details pertaining to a Lunar outpost architecture, discusses the viable concept of operations for each architecture, and compares the equivalent system mass (ESM) of the cryogenic LOX, high pressure GOX, and electrolysis approaches across different parameter trades, e.g. mission duration or extravehicular activity frequency, for the single and 10-year mission architectures. For a single nominal mission, high pressure GOX is favored for short missions (< 50 days); cryogenic LOX is favored for a wide-range of mission durations (50 – 270 days); and the electrolysis approach is favored for long missions (> 270 days). However, when considering a 10-year mission architecture, each additional resupply negatively impacts cryogenic LOX due to the additional replacement tankage. Thus, over a 10-year mission, an electrolysis approach, which can provide all life support O2 utilizing solely recovered H2O, appears to be favored over cryogenic LOX. However, a real electrolysis system may need resupplied H2O due to incomplete closure of the air revitalization loop. Thus, the cryogenic LOX approach was compared with the electrolysis approaches utilizing 100% resupplied or 100% recovered H2O to approximate the resupplied to recovered H2O ratio, i.e. the degree of loop closure, where one approach trades over the other. Additionally, gaps were identified, which are expected to affect the viability and trade of cryogenic LOX. These include the development of cryogenic pumps and vaporizers to generate high pressure GOX from LOX as well as understanding payload limitations which can affect O2 resupply.