Validation of an Automated System for Arrival Traffic Management

The fuel-efficiencies of arrival flights that were managed by an automated system were compared to the fuel-efficiencies of arrival flights that were managed by air traffic controllers. It was infeasible to have the automated system control arrivals in real operations, so the comparison was accomplished by setting up a fast-time simulation where the automated system could manage arrivals with the same initial conditions and flight plans as those that operated in real operations during a selected comparison period and in the same background traffic. For this study, Newark Liberty International Airport was selected as the arrival airport because its high traffic load and constrained arrival procedures were expected to highlight fuel-efficiency benefits of an automated system. In the simulation, the automated system managed Newark arrivals, and the other flights (arrivals to other airports, departures, and overflights) composed the background traffic. To match the simulation and the real operations background traffic, the other flights flew in simulation the same trajectory that they flew in real operations during the comparison period. Fuel-efficiency was measured by calculating fuel burns of the arrival trajectories. The fuel-efficiencies of arrival trajectories produced in the simulation were compared with the estimated fuel-efficiencies of arrival trajectories recorded from real operations during the comparison period. Results showed that automation managed arrivals burned 346 lbs less fuel per flight on average than controller managed arrivals.