Selection of Alternator Voltage for Dynamic Radioisotope Power Systems

In this paper, we present a study to select an appropriate alternator voltage of the free-piston Stirling convertors (FPSC) for efficient and light Dynamic Radioisotope Power Systems (DRPS). With a system thermal-to-electrical efficiency 3-4 times greater than radioisotope thermoelectric generator (RTG) systems and a higher power density than Brayton systems in the power range of interest for radioisotope-powered systems, Stirling-based DRPS is uniquely suited to benefit upcoming NASA missions. Much effort has been invested in the design and optimization of the thermal, mechanical, and materials aspects of FPSCs, but the electrical aspect has been more nebulous. Therefore, in this paper, a preliminary study will be presented to select the appropriate Stirling alternator voltage to develop a light and efficient system using available flight components. Power conversion systems face a trade between efficiency and system volume/mass with the optimal trade being determined by the application. Neglecting non-idealities related to insulation thickness and winding packing factor and assuming a constant winding area, alternator efficiency is independent of alternator voltage. Because wire size and alternator current can be traded against turn count and alternator voltage without impacting efficiency, the guidance on the optimal design comes from analysis of the controller power electronics and the remainder of the system. Properties of available flight-qualified electrical components, such as rated voltage/current and on-resistance, typically come in discrete values instead of a continuous range of values. With multiple components being required to form the power conversion stage of the controller, each limited to incremental values, a continuous optimization is of little benefit. Instead of a continuous optimization, a random process using properties of the available components can be used to develop a Pareto design front indicating the optimized trade space. The most advantageous trade between system efficiency and mass for the system at hand can then be selected from the range of feasible designs. In the final paper, the design process, assumptions, and preliminary results will be presented.