NASA Logo

NTRS

NTRS - NASA Technical Reports Server

Back to Results
An Examination of the Recent Stability of Ozonesonde Global Network DataThe recent Assessment of Standard Operating Procedures for OzoneSondes (ASOPOS 2.0; WMO/GAW Report #268) addressed questions of homogeneity and long-term stability in global electrochemical concentration cell (ECC) ozone sounding network time series. Among its recommendations was adoption of a standard for evaluating data quality in ozonesonde time series. Total column ozone (TCO) derived from the sondes compared to TCO from Aura’s Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) is a primary quality indicator. Comparisons of sonde ozone with Aura’s Microwave Limb Sounder (MLS) are used to assess the stability of stratospheric
ozone. This paper provides a comprehensive examination of global ozonesonde network data stability and accuracy since 2004 in light of the sudden post-2013 TCO “dropoff” of ~3-4% that was reported previously at select stations (Stauffer et al., 2020). Comparisons with Aura OMI TCO averaged across the network of 60 stations are stable within about ±2% over the past 18 years. Sonde TCO has similar stability compared to three other TCO satellite instruments, and the stratospheric ozone measurements average to within ±5% of MLS from 50 to 10 hPa. Thus, sonde data are reliable for trends, but with a caveat applied for a subset of dropoff stations in the tropics and subtropics. The dropoff is associated with only one of two major ECC instrument types. A detailed examination of ECC serial numbers pinpoints the timing of the dropoff. However, we find that overall, ozonesonde data are stable and accurate compared to independent measurements over the past two decades.
Document ID
20220014106
Acquisition Source
Goddard Space Flight Center
Document Type
Accepted Manuscript (Version with final changes)
Authors
Ryan M. Stauffer ORCID
(Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt, Maryland, United States)
Anne M. Thompson ORCID
(University of Maryland, Baltimore County Baltimore, Maryland, United States)
Debra E. Kollonige ORCID
(Science Systems and Applications (United States) Lanham, Maryland, United States)
David W. Tarasick ORCID
(Environment and Climate Change Canada Dorval, Quebec, Canada)
Roeland Van Malderen ORCID
(Royal Meteorological Institute of Belgium Brussels, Belgium)
Herman G. J. Smit ORCID
(Forschungszentrum Jülich Jülich, Germany)
Holger Vömel ORCID
(National Center for Atmospheric Research Boulder, Colorado, United States)
Gary A. Morris ORCID
(National Center for Atmospheric Research Boulder, Colorado, United States)
Bryan J. Johnson ORCID
(Earth System Research Laboratory Boulder, Colorado, United States)
Patrick D. Cullis ORCID
(Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences Boulder, Colorado, United States)
Rene Stübi ORCID
(Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology Zurich, Switzerland)
Jonathan Davies
(Environment and Climate Change Canada Canada)
Michael M. Yan
(KBR (United States) Houston, Texas, United States)
Date Acquired
September 15, 2022
Publication Date
September 23, 2022
Publication Information
Publication: Earth and Space Science
Publisher: AGU/Wiley Online
Volume: 9
Issue: 10
Issue Publication Date: October 1, 2022
e-ISSN: 2333-5084
Subject Category
Quality Assurance And Reliability
Meteorology And Climatology
Funding Number(s)
WBS: 281945.02.80.01.06
CONTRACT_GRANT: GSFC - 610.0
CONTRACT_GRANT: NNG17HP01C
CONTRACT_GRANT: 80GSFC17C0003
Distribution Limits
Public
Copyright
Portions of document may include copyright protected material.
Technical Review
External Peer Committee
No Preview Available