NASA Logo

NTRS

NTRS - NASA Technical Reports Server

Back to Results
Benefits of Trash-to-Gas Versus Jettison of Waste Via Trash-Lock for Mars TransitHuman exploration missions to Mars pose difficulties due to the significant waste that will be generated during transit, which will need to be carried along or disposed of in some fashion. Waste removal from the spacecraft decreases the spacecraft’s mass as well as the associated logistic items necessary for storing the waste. A mission propellant analysis was performed to highlight the mass benefits that may be accessed via waste removal. The propellant mass savings were determined for different waste removal rates (2.9 – 11.6 kg/day) with the highest removal rate leading to the greatest propellant savings of 7,785 kg for an 850-day round-trip mission. Due to these benefits, two methods for waste reduction were studied for the 850-day Mars mission: Trash-to-Gas (TtG) and physical jettison via a trash-lock. The trash-to-gas methods considered were combustion, steam reforming, and pyrolysis, which convert waste into ventable gases (e.g., CO2, CO, CH4, etc.). Combustion and steam reforming require a co-reactant (O2 and/or H2O). Therefore, additional processing units or integration with the spacecraft’s environmental control and life support system (ECLSS) are required to facilitate recycle of the pertinent species. In contrast, pyrolysis is a purely thermal degradation process, which can operate as a standalone system; however, a lower percentage of waste is gasified with pyrolysis. The study herein compares standalone TtG (e.g., Advanced Organic Waste Gasifier, Plasma Pyrolysis, etc.), integrated TtG-ECLSS (e.g., Orbital Syngas Commodity Augmentation Reactor, Incineration/Gasification, etc.), and physical jettison. Each system’s mass, volume, power, and cooling requirements were compared via an equivalent system mass (ESM) analysis to ascertain potentially promising technologies that can achieve efficient waste removal while minimizing their own spacecraft load. This study highlights the advantages and disadvantages of the different waste management technologies and provides recommendations on the promising technologies based on the ESM metric and propellant mass savings.
Document ID
20230000658
Acquisition Source
Johnson Space Center
Document Type
Conference Paper
Authors
Thomas T. Chen
(Johnson Space Center Houston, Texas, United States)
Michael K. Ewert
(Johnson Space Center Houston, Texas, United States)
Joel A. Olson
(Bennett Aerospace (United States) Cary, North Carolina, United States)
Date Acquired
January 13, 2023
Subject Category
Man/System Technology And Life Support
Meeting Information
Meeting: 52nd International Conference on Environmental Systems (ICES)
Location: Calgary
Country: CA
Start Date: July 16, 2023
End Date: July 20, 2023
Sponsors: ILC Dover (United States)
Funding Number(s)
WBS: 089407
Distribution Limits
Public
Copyright
Public Use Permitted.
Technical Review
NASA Peer Committee
Keywords
Jettison
Trash-to-Gas
ESM
Logistics Reduction
Waste Management
Waste
Waste Removal
Mars Transit
No Preview Available