NASA Logo

NTRS

NTRS - NASA Technical Reports Server

Back to Results
Comparisons Between the Distributions of Dust and Combustion Aerosols in MERRA-2, FLEXPART and CALIPSO and Implications for Deposition Freezing Over Wintertime SiberiaAerosol distributions have a potentially large influence on climate-relevant cloud properties but can be difficult to observe over the Arctic given pervasive cloudiness, long polar nights, data paucity over remote regions, and periodic diamond dust events that satellites can misclassify as aerosol. We compared Arctic 2008–2015 mineral dust and combustion aerosol distributions from the Cloud-Aerosol Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observation (CALIPSO) satellite, the Modern-Era Retrospective analysis for Research and Applications, Version 2 (MERRA-2) reanalysis products, and the FLEXible PARTicle (FLEXPART) dispersion model. Based on coincident, seasonal Atmospheric Infrared Sounder (AIRS) Arctic satellite meteorological data, diamond dust may occur up to 60 % of the time in winter, but it hardly ever occurs in summer. In its absence, MERRA-2 and FLEXPART each predict the vertical and horizontal distribution of large-scale patterns in combustion aerosols with relatively high confidence (Kendall tau rank correlation > 0.6), although a sizable amount of variability is still unaccounted for. They do the same for dust, except in conditions conducive to diamond dust formation where CALIPSO is likely misclassifying diamond dust as mineral dust and near the surface (< ∼ 2 km) where FLEXPART may be overpredicting local dust emissions. Comparisons to ground data suggest that MERRA-2 Arctic dust concentrations can be improved by the addition of local dust sources. All three products predicted that wintertime dust and combustion aerosols occur most frequently over the same Siberian regions where diamond dust is most common in the winter. This suggests that dust aerosol impacts on ice phase processes may be particularly high over Siberia, although further wintertime model validation with non-CALIPSO observations is needed. This assessment paves the way for applying the model-based aerosol simulations to a range of regional-scale Arctic aerosol–cloud interaction studies with greater confidence.
Document ID
20230002251
Acquisition Source
Goddard Space Flight Center
Document Type
Accepted Manuscript (Version with final changes)
Authors
Lauren M. Zamora ORCID
(University of Maryland, College Park College Park, Maryland, United States)
Ralph A. Kahn ORCID
(Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt, Maryland, United States)
Nikolaos Evangeliou ORCID
(Norwegian Institute for Air Research Lillestrøm, Norway)
Christine D. Groot Zwaaftink ORCID
(Norwegian Institute for Air Research Lillestrøm, Norway)
Klaus B. Huebert
(Consolidated Safety Services-Dynamac (United States) Fairfax, Virginia, United States)
Date Acquired
February 16, 2023
Publication Date
September 20, 2022
Publication Information
Publication: Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
Publisher: European Geosciences Union / Copernicus Publications
Volume: 22
Issue: 18
Issue Publication Date: September 15, 2022
ISSN: 1680-7316
e-ISSN: 1680-7324
URL: https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/12269/2022/
Subject Category
Geosciences (General)
Funding Number(s)
WBS: 281945.02.31.04.22
CONTRACT_GRANT: 80NSSC23M0011
CONTRACT_GRANT: 80NSSC19K0978
CONTRACT_GRANT: RCN 275407
Distribution Limits
Public
Copyright
Portions of document may include copyright protected material.
Technical Review
External Peer Committee
Keywords
MERRA-2
aerosol distirbution
cloud properties
No Preview Available