NASA Logo

NTRS

NTRS - NASA Technical Reports Server

Back to Results
Partition Thickness Considerations for Additively Manufactured Acoustic LinersThree types of uniform-depth liners are evaluated to explore the effects of partition thickness on the surface impedance achieved with additively manufactured liners. A transmission line code is used to predict the effects of sound transmission through empty chambers and wire mesh facesheets, and is combined with the Motsinger and Kraft model to account for sound transmission through perforated facesheets. The inclusion of partitions causes a blockage effect, i.e., a portion of the surface is ‘blocked’ (nonactive surface). For liners with no facesheet, these blockage effects are incorporated simply by accounting for the change in cross sectional area between the individual chamber and the unit cell that includes half of a partition thickness around the perimeter of this chamber. Comparison of impedances predicted in this manner with data acquired in the NASA Langley Normal Incidence Tube (NIT) confirms the efficacy of this modeling approach. Two approaches are considered to account for the inclusion of a wiremesh or perforated plate facesheet on these same cores. The first accounts for the effects of partition thickness before including the transfer impedance across the facesheet, while the second reverses these steps. A comparison of data acquired in the NASA NIT with modeled impedances suggests the first approach is best when the facesheet is a wire mesh, but the second approach is preferred when a perforated plate facesheet is used. It is hypothesized that this is due to the fact that a lumped element model is used to compute the transfer impedance across a wire mesh, while the corresponding transfer impedance across a perforated sheet explicitly incorporates the efffects of the liner core. However, comparisons of data acquired in the NASA Langley Grazing Flow Impedance Tube with modeled impedances seem slightly better when the first approach is employed with a perforated plate facesheet. Thus, the effects of partition thickness on liners with perforated sheets subjected to grazing incidence sound require further review
Document ID
20230013028
Acquisition Source
Langley Research Center
Document Type
Technical Memorandum (TM)
Authors
Michael G. Jones
(Langley Research Center Hampton, Virginia, United States)
Douglas M. Nark
(Langley Research Center Hampton, Virginia, United States)
Date Acquired
September 6, 2023
Publication Date
October 1, 2023
Subject Category
Acoustics
Funding Number(s)
WBS: 081876.02.07.50.10.02.03
Distribution Limits
Public
Copyright
Work of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.
Keywords
acoustic
liner
partition
blockage
No Preview Available