NASA Logo

NTRS

NTRS - NASA Technical Reports Server

Back to Results
Global Carbon Budget 2022Accurate assessment of anthropogenic carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions and their redistribution among the atmosphere, ocean, and terrestrial biosphere in a changing climate is critical to better understand the global carbon cycle, support the development of climate policies, and project future climate change. Here we describe and synthesize data sets and methodologies to quantify the five major components of the global carbon budget and their uncertainties. Fossil CO2 emissions (EFOS) are based on energy statistics and cement production data, while emissions from land-use change (ELUC), mainly deforestation, are based on land use and land-use change data and bookkeeping models. Atmospheric CO2 concentration is measured directly, and its growth rate (GATM) is computed from the annual changes in concentration. The ocean CO2 sink (SOCEAN) is estimated with global ocean biogeochemistry models and observation-based data products. The terrestrial CO2 sink (SLAND) is estimated with dynamic global vegetation models. The resulting carbon budget imbalance (BIM), the difference between the estimated total emissions and the estimated changes in the atmosphere, ocean, and terrestrial biosphere, is a measure of imperfect data and understanding of the contemporary carbon cycle. All uncertainties are reported as ±1σ.
For the year 2021, EFOS increased by 5.1 % relative to 2020, with fossil emissions at 10.1 ± 0.5 GtC yr−1 (9.9 ± 0.5 GtC yr−1 when the cement carbonation sink is included), and ELUC was 1.1 ± 0.7 GtC yr−1, for a total anthropogenic CO2 emission (including the cement carbonation sink) of 10.9 ± 0.8 GtC yr−1 (40.0 ± 2.9 GtCO2). Also, for 2021, GATM was 5.2 ± 0.2 GtC yr−1 (2.5 ± 0.1 ppm yr−1), SOCEAN was 2.9  ± 0.4 GtC yr−1, and SLAND was 3.5 ± 0.9 GtC yr−1, with a BIM of −0.6 GtC yr−1 (i.e. the total estimated sources were too low or sinks were too high). The global atmospheric CO2 concentration averaged over 2021 reached 414.71 ± 0.1 ppm. Preliminary data for 2022 suggest an increase in EFOS relative to 2021 of +1.0 % (0.1 % to 1.9 %) globally and atmospheric CO2 concentration reaching 417.2 ppm, more than 50 % above pre-industrial levels (around 278 ppm). Overall, the mean and trend in the components of the global carbon budget are consistently estimated over the period 1959–2021, but discrepancies of up to 1 GtC yr−1 persist for the representation of annual to semi-decadal variability in CO2 fluxes. Comparison of estimates from multiple approaches and observations shows (1) a persistent large uncertainty in the estimate of land-use change emissions, (2) a low agreement between the different methods on the magnitude of the land CO2 flux in the northern extratropics, and (3) a discrepancy between the different methods on the strength of the ocean sink over the last decade. This living data update documents changes in the methods and data sets used in this new global carbon budget and the progress in understanding of the global carbon cycle compared with previous publications of this data set. The data presented in this work are available at https://doi.org/10.18160/GCP-2022 (Friedlingstein et al., 2022b).
Document ID
20230013723
Acquisition Source
Goddard Space Flight Center
Document Type
Reprint (Version printed in journal)
Authors
Pierre Friedlingstein ORCID
(University of Exeter Exeter, United Kingdom)
Michael O'Sullivan ORCID
(University of Exeter Exeter, United Kingdom)
Matthew W Jones
(University of East Anglia Norwich, Norfolk, United Kingdom)
Robbie M Andrew ORCID
(CICERO Center for International Climate Research Oslo, Norway)
Luke Gregor ORCID
(ETH Zurich Zurich, Switzerland)
Judith Hauck ORCID
(Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research Bremerhaven, Germany)
Corinne Le Quéré ORCID
(University of East Anglia Norwich, Norfolk, United Kingdom)
Ingrid T Luijkx ORCID
(Wageningen University & Research Wageningen, Netherlands)
Are Olsen ORCID
(University of Bergen Bergen, Hordaland, Norway)
Glen P Peters ORCID
(CICERO Center for International Climate Research Oslo, Norway)
Wouter Peters ORCID
(Wageningen University & Research Wageningen, Netherlands)
Julia Pongratz ORCID
(Max Planck Institute for Meteorology Hamburg, Germany)
Clemens Schwingshackl ORCID
(Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich Munich, Germany)
Stephen Sitch
(University of Exeter Exeter, United Kingdom)
Josep G Canadell ORCID
(CSIRO Ocean and Atmosphere Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia)
Philippe Ciais ORCID
(Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement Gif-sur-Yvette, France)
Robert B Jackson ORCID
(Stanford University Stanford, California, United States)
Simone R Alin
(Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory Seattle, Washington, United States)
Ramdane Alkama
(Joint Research Centre Ispra, Italy)
Almut Arneth ORCID
(Karlsruhe Institute of Technology Karlsruhe, Germany)
Vivek K Arora
(Environment and Climate Change Canada Gatineau, Quebec, Canada)
Nicholas R Bates
(Bermuda Institute of Ocean Sciences Saint George, Bermuda)
Meike Becker ORCID
(University of Bergen Bergen, Hordaland, Norway)
Nicolas Bellouin ORCID
(University of Reading Reading, United Kingdom)
Henry C Bittig ORCID
(Leibniz Institute for Baltic Sea Research Warnemünde, Germany)
Laurent Bopp ORCID
(Laboratoire de Météorologie Dynamique Palaiseau, France)
Frédéric Chevallier ORCID
(Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement Gif-sur-Yvette, France)
Louise P Chini ORCID
(University of Maryland, College Park College Park, Maryland, United States)
Margot Cronin
(Marine Institute Oranmore, Galway, Ireland)
Wiley Evans ORCID
(Hakai Institute Campbell River, Canada)
Stefanie Falk ORCID
(Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich Munich, Germany)
Richard A Feely
(Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory Seattle, Washington, United States)
Thomas Gasser ORCID
(International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis Laxenburg, Austria)
Marion Gehlen ORCID
(Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement Gif-sur-Yvette, France)
Thanos Gkritzalis
(Flanders Marine Institute Ostend, Belgium)
Benjamin Poulter ORCID
(Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt, Maryland, United States)
Date Acquired
September 21, 2023
Publication Date
November 11, 2022
Publication Information
Publication: Earth System Science Data
Publisher: Copernicus.org (Germany)
Volume: 14
Issue: 11
Issue Publication Date: November 11, 2022
ISSN: 1866-3508
e-ISSN: 1866-3516
Subject Category
Earth Resources and Remote Sensing
Funding Number(s)
WBS: 281945.02.03.11.35
CONTRACT_GRANT: FWO I001821N
CONTRACT_GRANT: China, NNSF 41975155
CONTRACT_GRANT: China, NNSF 42141020
CONTRACT_GRANT: China, NNSF 41921005
CONTRACT_GRANT: China SFSR QD2021024C
CONTRACT_GRANT: China, STPSERP 2022QZKK0101
CONTRACT_GRANT: China, CAST YESS20200135
CONTRACT_GRANT: EC H2020 (4C 821003)
CONTRACT_GRANT: EC H2020 (CoCO2 958927)
CONTRACT_GRANT: EC H2020 (COMFORT 820989)
CONTRACT_GRANT: EC H2020 (CONSTRAIN 820829)
CONTRACT_GRANT: EC H2020 (ESM2025 101003536)
CONTRACT_GRANT: EC H2020 (JERICO-S3 871153)
CONTRACT_GRANT: EC H2020 (VERIFY 776810)
PROJECT: 655 (ESRIN/4000123002/18/I-NB)
CONTRACT_GRANT: 4000137603/22/I-DT
PROJECT: DFG 390683824
PROJECT: “CDRSynTra” (01LS2101A)
PROJECT: ”DArgo2025” (03F0857C)
CONTRACT_GRANT: MarESys VH-NG-1301
OTHER: JPMEERF21S20810
CONTRACT_GRANT: JGERCSME E1751
OTHER: JPMEERF21S20800
CONTRACT_GRANT: N-ICOS-2 296012
CONTRACT_GRANT: NRC 270061
CONTRACT_GRANT: Swiss, NSF 200020-200511
OTHER: SQ2022QZKK0101
CONTRACT_GRANT: UK RS RP\R1\191063
CONTRACT_GRANT: SONATA NE/P021417/1
CONTRACT_GRANT: UK, NE/R016518/1
CONTRACT_GRANT: UK, NE/V01417X/1
CONTRACT_GRANT: UK, RP\R1\191063
CONTRACT_GRANT: NOAA NA20OAR4320271
CONTRACT_GRANT: DOE DESC0012972
CONTRACT_GRANT: NASA 80NM0018F0583
CONTRACT_GRANT: NASA 80NSSC17K0348
CONTRACT_GRANT: NSF 1852977
CONTRACT_GRANT: NSF 1903722
Distribution Limits
Public
Copyright
Portions of document may include copyright protected material.
Technical Review
External Peer Committee
No Preview Available