NASA Logo

NTRS

NTRS - NASA Technical Reports Server

Back to Results
The NASA Ames Mars Global Climate Model: Benchmarking Publicly Released Source Code and Model OutputWe have recently publicly released source code from the new NASA Ames Mars Global Climate Model
(MGCM), which is based on NOAA/GFDL cubed-sphere finite volume (FV3-based) dynamical core
(https://github.com/nasa/AmesGCM). We also we have a manuscript in preparation that aims to
document the status of the new MGCM, and present selected simulations generated from it with
interpretations and comparisons to both observations and the Ames Legacy MGCM. Output from our
reference simulation will be made publicly available as well. One of our ongoing goals is to understand
the underlying causes for differences between results produced with the new FV3-based dynamical core
compared to the Legacy C-grid dynamical core. While the thermal and dynamical fields predicted with
the new and Legacy GCMs are broadly similar for much of the year, there are key differences at low
resolution when no external drag is applied to the new MGCM. This is particularly clear during a
seasonal window of ~100 degrees of Ls surrounding southern summer solstice, when the predicted
northern hemisphere polar warming is significantly over-predicted in the new MGCM. When we apply
Rayleigh drag throughout much of the tropics and sub-tropics to the new MGCM, the simulated zonal
mean structure of the atmosphere is much more consistent with both MCS observations and Legacy
MGCM simulations. We note that the Kling et al. (2023; this meeting) study demonstrates that the
behavior that we see with Rayleigh drag here can be recovered with high resolution simulations (in the
horizontal and in the vertical) or with parameterized orographic and non-orographic gravity waves at
lower resolution. While this work is still in progress, our preliminary conclusion is that the new
dynamical core is less dissipative than the Legacy dynamical core. At low to moderate resolution, users of
the new MGCM will need to be careful to use some sort of external drag, either in the form of gravity
wave drag parameterizations or the simpler Rayleigh drag.
Document ID
20230015428
Acquisition Source
Ames Research Center
Document Type
Abstract
Authors
Melinda April Kahre
(Ames Research Center Mountain View, California, United States)
Robert John Wilson
(Ames Research Center Mountain View, California, United States)
Richard Atsuki Urata
(Bay Area Environmental Research Institute Petaluma, California, United States)
Courtney Marylou Batterson
(Bay Area Environmental Research Institute Petaluma, California, United States)
Amanda Susanne Brecht
(Ames Research Center Mountain View, California, United States)
Alexandre Mathias Philippe Kling
(Universities Space Research Association Columbia, Maryland, United States)
Kathryn Elizabeth Steakley
(Bay Area Environmental Research Institute Petaluma, California, United States)
Victoria Hartwick
(Association of Bay Area Governments Oakland, California, United States)
Tanguy Bertrand
(Laboratory of Space Studies and Instrumentation in Astrophysics Meudon, France)
Chester E Harman
(Columbia University New York, New York, United States)
Leonardos Gkouvelis
(Universities Space Research Association Columbia, Maryland, United States)
Date Acquired
October 25, 2023
Subject Category
Lunar and Planetary Science and Exploration
Meeting Information
Meeting: 23rd Meeting of the American Geophysical Union (AGU)
Location: San Francisco, CA
Country: US
Start Date: December 11, 2023
End Date: December 15, 2023
Sponsors: American Geophysical Union
Funding Number(s)
WBS: 811073.02.52.01.10
Distribution Limits
Public
Copyright
Public Use Permitted.
No Preview Available