NASA Logo

NTRS

NTRS - NASA Technical Reports Server

Advisory – Planned Maintenance: On Monday, July 15 at 9 PM Eastern the STI Compliance and Distribution Services will be performing planned maintenance on the STI Repository (NTRS) for approximately one hour. During this time users will not be able to access the STI Repository (NTRS).

Back to Results
Future of the Search for Life: Workshop ReportThe 2-week, virtual Future of the Search for Life science and engineering workshop brought together more than 100 scientists, engineers, and technologists in March and April 2022 to provide their expert opinion on the interconnections between life-detection science and technology. Participants identified the advances in measurement and sampling technologies they believed to be necessary to perform in situ searches for life elsewhere in our Solar System, 20 years or more in the future. Among suggested measurements for these searches, those pertaining to three potential indicators of life termed “dynamic disequilibrium,” “catalysis,” and “informational polymers” were identified as particularly promising avenues for further exploration. For these three indicators, small breakout groups of participants identified measurement needs and knowledge gaps, along with corresponding constraints on sample handling (acquisition and processing) approaches for a variety of environments on Enceladus, Europa, Mars, and Titan. Despite the diversity of these environments, sample processing approaches all tend to be more complex than those that have been implemented on missions or envisioned for mission concepts to date. The approaches considered by workshop breakout groups progress from nondestructive to destructive measurement techniques, and most involve the need for fluid (especially liquid) sample processing. Sample processing needs were identified as technology gaps. These gaps include technology and associated sampling strategies that allow the preservation of the thermal, mechanical, and chemical integrity of the samples upon acquisition; and to optimize the sample information obtained by operating suites of instruments on common samples. Crucially, the interplay between science-driven life-detection strategies and their technological implementation highlights the need for an unprecedented level of payload integration and extensive collaboration between scientists and engineers, starting from concept formulation through mission deployment of life-detection instruments and sample processing systems.
Document ID
20240000719
Acquisition Source
Goddard Space Flight Center
Document Type
Accepted Manuscript (Version with final changes)
Authors
Marc Neveu ORCID
(University of Maryland, College Park College Park, United States)
Richard Quinn
(Ames Research Center Mountain View, United States)
Laura M Barge ORCID
(Jet Propulsion Laboratory La Cañada Flintridge, United States)
Kathleen L. Craft
(Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory North Laurel, United States)
Christopher R. German ORCID
(Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution Falmouth, United States)
Stephanie Getty
(Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt, United States)
Christopher Glein
(Southwest Research Institute San Antonio, United States)
Macarena Parra
(Ames Research Center Mountain View, United States)
Aaron S. Burton
(Johnson Space Center Houston, United States)
Francesca Cary ORCID
(University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa Honolulu, United States)
Andrea Corpolongo ORCID
(University of Cincinnati Cincinnati, Ohio, United States)
Lucas Fifer ORCID
(University of Washington Seattle, United States)
Andrew Gangidine
(Yale University New Haven, United States)
Diana Gentry
(Ames Research Center Mountain View, United States)
Christos D. Georgiou ORCID
(University of Patras Pátrai, Greece)
Zaid Haddadin
(University of California, San Diego San Diego, United States)
Craig Herbold
(University of Canterbury Christchurch, New Zealand)
Aila Inaba
(Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey New Brunswick, United States)
Séan F Jordan
(Dublin City University Dublin, Ireland)
Hemani Kalucha
(California Institute of Technology Pasadena, United States)
Pavel Klier
(Oak Ridge Associated Universities Oak Ridge, United States)
Kas Knicely
(University of Alaska Fairbanks Fairbanks, United States)
An Y. Li
(University of Washington Seattle, United States)
Patrick McNally
(University of Michigan–Ann Arbor Ann Arbor, United States)
Maëva Millan
(Atmospheres Laboratory Environments, Observations Spatiales Guyancourt, France)
Neveda Naz ORCID
(Tufts University Medford, United States)
Chinmayee Govinda Raj
(Georgia Institute of Technology Atlanta, United States)
Peter Schroedl
(Boston University Boston, United States)
Jennifer Timm
(Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey New Brunswick, United States)
Ziming Yang
(Oakland University Rochester, United States)
Date Acquired
January 17, 2024
Publication Date
January 12, 2024
Publication Information
Publication: Astrobiology
Publisher: Mary Ann Liebert (United States)
Volume: 24
Issue: 1
Issue Publication Date: January 1, 2024
ISSN: 1531-1074
e-ISSN: 1557-8070
Subject Category
Exobiology
Life Sciences (General)
Funding Number(s)
CONTRACT_GRANT: 80GSFC21M0002
CONTRACT_GRANT: 80NM0018D0004
CONTRACT_GRANT: 1531256
CONTRACT_GRANT: J-090015
CONTRACT_GRANT: J-090007
CONTRACT_GRANT: AMESVE10012012
CONTRACT_GRANT: J-090011
CONTRACT_GRANT: 80HQTR21CA005
CONTRACT_GRANT: 1656153
Distribution Limits
Public
Copyright
Portions of document may include copyright protected material.
Technical Review
External Peer Committee
No Preview Available