NASA Logo

NTRS

NTRS - NASA Technical Reports Server

Press Enter or click the Search button to begin your search.

Back to Results
Offset-Stoichiometric Reflowable Composite Bonding Method with Adhesive for Mitigating Strict Faying Surface TolerancesInherent susceptibility of adhesive bonds to miniscule quantities of contamination can cause undetectable weakened bonds. For this reason, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) places strict regulations on adhesively bonded joints in primary aircraft structures. To meet certification requirements aircraft manufactures resort to redundant load paths in the form of fasteners which inherently add weight to the structure and increase manufacturing time. In prior work, a secondary bonding technique called AERoBOND was developed, which utilized off-stoichiometric epoxymatrix resins to facilitate reflow and diffusion of the resin within the joint interface during a secondary bonding/cure process, thus achieving a bond similar to a co-cured joint. However, the AERoBOND process required tight spatial tolerances between the two parts being joined. This study examined the utilization of conventional adhesive with the AERoBOND method to act as a filler in the joint line, effectively reducing the need for tight tolerances on the joining parts and serving as a flexible alternative for existing manufacturing processes. Ultrasonic inspection, optical microscopy, and ASTM International standard tests were performed to analyze the joints for defects and to quantify the mode-I and mode-II interlaminar fracture toughness and short beam strength of the proposed methodology with varying manufacturing parameters. The comprehensive results indicate that the AERoBOND+ method with and without surface preparation performs comparably to co-cured and conventional, adhesively bonded joints when secondary cured in an autoclave with 791 kPa of pressure. As an example, the AERoBOND+ panel
without surface preparation bonded with 791 kPa of pressure (referred to as AB+3 throughout paper) had a mode-I fracture toughness (GIc) of 0.643 kJ/m2 and a mode-II fracture toughness (GIIc) of 4.000 kJ/m2 in the non-precracked condition and 4.218 kJ/m2 in the precracked condition at the adhesive-to-prepreg interface. These results were 96%, 142%, and 217%, respectively, of a co-cured baseline panel (referred to as C1 throughout paper).
Document ID
20240005831
Acquisition Source
Langley Research Center
Document Type
Accepted Manuscript (Version with final changes)
Authors
Tyler B. Hudson
(Langley Research Center Hampton, Virginia, United States)
Austin J. Smith
(Langley Research Center Hampton, Virginia, United States)
Nicholas J. McWeeney
(Clarkson University Potsdam, United States)
Charles T. Dolph
(California State University, Long Beach Long Beach, California, United States)
Jin Ho Kang
(Langley Research Center Hampton, Virginia, United States)
Roberto J Cano
(Langley Research Center Hampton, Virginia, United States)
Frank L Palmieri
(Langley Research Center Hampton, Virginia, United States)
Date Acquired
May 8, 2024
Publication Date
October 11, 2024
Publication Information
Publication: Composite Structures
Publisher: ScienceDirect
ISSN: 0263-8223
e-ISSN: 1879-1085
Subject Category
Composite Materials
Funding Number(s)
WBS: 816088.04.07.02
WBS: 107210.02.20.07.06
Distribution Limits
Public
Copyright
Portions of document may include copyright protected material.
Technical Review
Single Expert
Keywords
Composites
Bonding
Adhesive
Reflowable Interface
Fracture Toughness
No Preview Available