NASA Logo

NTRS

NTRS - NASA Technical Reports Server

Due to the lapse in federal government funding, NASA is not updating this website. We sincerely regret this inconvenience.

Back to Results
Lunar Science Real-Time Operations and Mission Systems Integration Definitions and Practices From NASA's VIPER MissionMission system design for the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Volatiles Investigating Polar Exploration Rover (VIPER) mission began with focusing on building key components including a solar-powered rover and the ground data system for operating it on the Moon for 100-Earth-days. The VIPER mission would be designed to support teams of people on Earth and a robot on the Moon carrying out a scientifically planned search for water ice, over a distance of 20 km. Initially, within the mission system design the involvement of VIPER’s science team (VST) was noted as “the science customer” - a designation and acknowledgement of a key workgroup in the mission. The VST’s work support needs, for a science work system, however, had not yet been defined by the VST in terms of systems and architecture. As the VST’s Science Operations team conducted research to develop a science operations system and architecture for VIPER’s science mission activities they found the science system needs for supporting real-time lunar science were greater than that which was designated in the mission system for the science customer. They decided to focus on developing the science operations system via ongoing integration rather than establishing a separate science component that later would be adjoined to the mission system. VIPER Science Operations enacted integration as an ongoing work practice; integration was a carried out as a regular activity that required schedule and agenda planning to be carried out on a daily and weekly basis, and adjustments in accordance with other workgroups’ activities. The work of integrating requires including and maintaining a greater number of considerations in the short-term work plan such as scheduling and product considerations (e.g., goals, interface features, networks, workspace build, mission simulations) and human relationships. In the long-term, ongoing integration approach can yield benefits that include fewer system conflicts, which can be avoided by learning of conflicts during development when they can be addressed. In addition to lunar science operations development and training with the VIPER Science team, integration included working with VIPER Mission system’s operating software workgroup, as well as the workgroups for rover drivers, planning and timelining, mission systems engineering, testing and training, and mission workspace preparation. This paper shows the work of integration as a process during the pre- surface operations development stage and highlights some examples of mission enhancing decisions that resulted from this integrated approach.
Document ID
20250004636
Acquisition Source
Ames Research Center
Document Type
Conference Paper
Authors
Zara Mirmalek
(Bay Area Environmental Research Institute Petaluma, United States)
Darlene S Lim
(Ames Research Center Mountain View, United States)
Anthony Colaprete
(Ames Research Center Mountain View, United States)
David Lees
(KBR (United States) Houston, Texas, United States)
Date Acquired
May 6, 2025
Subject Category
Lunar and Planetary Science and Exploration
Meeting Information
Meeting: 18th International Conference on Space Operations
Location: Montreal
Country: CA
Start Date: May 26, 2025
End Date: May 30, 2025
Sponsors: Canadian Space Agency, Canadian Aeronautics and Space Institute
Funding Number(s)
WBS: 993436.04.01
Distribution Limits
Public
Copyright
Use by or on behalf of the US Gov. Permitted.
Technical Review
Single Expert
Keywords
mission operations
tele-operated robot
lunar mission
systems integration
science operations
No Preview Available