NASA Logo

NTRS

NTRS - NASA Technical Reports Server

Due to the lapse in federal government funding, NASA is not updating this website. We sincerely regret this inconvenience.

Back to Results
The Sensitivity of Smoke Aerosol Dispersion to Smoke Injection Height and Source-Strength in Multiple AeroCom ModelsThe near-source and downwind impacts of smoke aerosols depend on both emitted mass and injection height. This study examines aerosol dispersion sensitivity to these factors using four global models from the AeroCom Phase III Biomass Burning Emission and Injection Height (BBEIH) experiment. Each model performed four simulations: (1) BASE, using a common emission inventory with default injection height; (2) BBIH, with vertical distribution adjusted using MISR plume heights; (3) BBEM, with an alternative emission inventory; and (4) NOBB, excluding biomass burning emissions. The focus is the April 2008 Siberian wildfire event. Aerosol optical depth (AOD) varied across models. The BASE model median is 27 % higher than the satellite median over the Siberian wildfire source region but is 37 % lower over the western North Pacific, indicating inadequate long-range transport or overly rapid aerosol removal in all models. Near the source, all models overestimate aerosol extinction below 2 km, suggesting injection heights were too low. The MISR plume heights slightly improved simulations, but downwind AOD remained largely underestimated. In BBEM, increased emissions in the models enhanced AOD near the source but did not improve AOD vertical structure there or downwind. Notably, CALIOP detected aerosol layers above 6 km from the source to downwind regions – features absent in all model simulations. These findings suggest that increasing emission strength alone is insufficient; improving vertical injection near-source to loft more smoke above 3 km in Siberia and reducing excessive aerosol wet removal during transport are critical.
Document ID
20250006667
Acquisition Source
Goddard Space Flight Center
Document Type
Preprint (Draft being sent to journal)
Authors
Xiaohua Pan
(Adnet Systems (United States) Bethesda, Maryland, United States)
Mian Chin
(Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt, United States)
Ralph A. Kahn
(University of Colorado Boulder Boulder, United States)
Hitoshi Matsui
(Nagoya University Nagoya, Japan)
Toshihiko Takemura
(Kyushu University Fukuoka, Japan)
Meiyun Lin
(NOAA Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Princeton, United States)
Yuanyu Xie
(Princeton University Princeton, United States)
Dongchul Kim
(University of Maryland, Baltimore County Baltimore, Maryland, United States)
Maria Val Martin
(University of Sheffield Sheffield, United Kingdom)
Date Acquired
July 1, 2025
Publication Date
June 30, 2025
Publication Information
Publication: Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP)
Publisher: European Geosciences Union
ISSN: 1680-7316
e-ISSN: 1680-7324
Subject Category
Chemistry and Materials (General)
Funding Number(s)
WBS: 281945.02.04.04.35
WBS: 281945.02.80.01.11
Distribution Limits
Public
Copyright
Portions of document may include copyright protected material.
Technical Review
Professional Review
No Preview Available