Comparison of measured and calculated airloads on an energy efficient transport wing model equipped with oscillating control surfaces

Wind-tunnel measurements of steady and unsteady pressures for a high-aspect-ratio supercritical wing model are compared with calculations by the linear unsteady aerodynamic lifting-surface theory, known as the Doublet Lattice method, at Mach numbers of 0.650 (subsonic) and 0.78 (transonic). The steady-pressure data comparisons are made for incremental changes in angle of attack and control-surface deflection. The unsteady-pressure data comparisons are made for oscillating control-surface deflections. Some differences between the measured and calculated aerodynamics are attributed to viscous and transonic effects that are not accounted for in the Doublet Lattice analysis. Comparisons of the transonic unsteady-pressure data for the oscillating control surfaces are improved by applying empirical corrections based on the steady-pressure measurements to the unsteady Doublet Lattice calculations.