Evaluation of several modal methods for transient structural analysis

The convergence properties of three modal methods for solving structural transient response (STR) problems are examined by comparing the accuracy of the total number of modes used to represent the responses. The goal is to identify a method which involves as few degrees of freedom as possible. Two mode superposition methods, the mode displacement method (MDM) and the mode acceleration method (MAM), are fitted with equivalent expressions for damped response. An error norm is employed to compare the accuracies of the methods in calculating displacements, moments, and shear forces for a viscously-damped cantilevered beam experiencing several dynamic loading conditions and levels of damping. The MAM converges quicker and uses fewer dof, mainly because it has a pseudo-static response term which accounts for some of the flexibility of higher modes. A third method, which integrates the convolution integral iteratively over time, generates a higher order approximation to the STR with a reduced number of modes. It converges fastest among the three, but requires definition of an appropriate forcing function. Finally, the MAM and MDM models are applied to study the effects of the forcing frequency and the initial conditions.