Comparison of earth-based radio metric data strategies for deep space navigation

Spacecraft angular coordinates can be determined with a variety of radio tracking measurements, such as Doppler, range, and Very Long Baseline Interferometry (VLBI)-derived data types. A relatively new interferometric tracking technique under development is Connected Element Interferometry (CEI), which uses a single frequency standard, distributed to two antennas spaced 10 to 100 km apart, to make highly accurate measurements of the phase-delay of incoming radio signals. The angular navigation accuracies attainable with Doppler, range, CEI, and VLBI data strategies are compared, using simple analytic models for these data types. The measurement accuracies assumed for Doppler, range, and VLBI data represent the performance expected from these systems in the Magellan and Galileo missions, while the assumed CEI data accuracy represents the anticipated performance of an experimental connected element system being constructed at the Deep Space Network's Goldstone, California complex. The results indicate that the Galileo VLBI system can deliver 20- to 25-nrad accuracy throughout the ecliptic plane. A hypothetical CEI dual-baseline sysem at Goldstone yielded accuracies in the 35- to 50-nrad range, while another hypothetical Goldstone-based system, consisting of a single CEI baseline and an X-band (8.4 GHz) Doppler system, produced accuracies of 25 to 100 nrad. Angular accuracies obtained from Doppler and range were found to be highly dependent upon the sensitivity of earth-spacecraft differential acceleration to small changes in geocentric spacecraft position.