An overview of self-consistent methods for fiber-reinforced composites

The Walker et al. (1989) self-consistent method to predict both the elastic and the inelastic effective material properties of composites is examined and compared with the results of other self-consistent and elastically based solutions. The elastic part of their method is shown to be identical to other self-consistent methods for non-dilute reinforced composite materials; they are the Hill (1965), Budiansky (1965), and Nemat-Nasser et al. (1982) derivations. A simplified form of the non-dilute self-consistent method is also derived. The predicted, elastic, effective material properties for fiber reinforced material using the Walker method was found to deviate from the elasticity solution for the v sub 31, K sub 12, and mu sub 31 material properties (fiber is in the 3 direction) especially at the larger volume fractions. Also, the prediction for the transverse shear modulus, mu sub 12, exceeds one of the accepted Hashin bounds. Only the longitudinal elastic modulus E sub 33 agrees with the elasticity solution. The differences between the Walker and the elasticity solutions are primarily due to the assumption used in the derivation of the self-consistent method, i.e., the strain fields in the inclusions and the matrix are assumed to remain constant, which is not a correct assumption for a high concentration of inclusions.