A comparison of artificial compressibility and fractional step methods for incompressible flow computations

We have applied and compared the efficiency and accuracy of two commonly used numerical methods for the solution of Navier-Stokes equations. The artificial compressibility method augments the continuity equation with a transient pressure term and allows one to solve the modified equations as a coupled system. Due to its implicit nature, one can have the luxury of taking a large temporal integration step at the expense of higher memory requirement and larger operation counts per step. Meanwhile, the fractional step method splits the Navier-Stokes equations into a sequence of differential operators and integrates them in multiple steps. The memory requirement and operation count per time step are low, however, the restriction on the size of time marching step is more severe. To explore the strengths and weaknesses of these two methods, we used them for the computation of a two-dimensional driven cavity flow with Reynolds number of 100 and 1000, respectively. Three grid sizes, 41 x 41, 81 x 81, and 161 x 161 were used. The computations were considered after the L2-norm of the change of the dependent variables in two consecutive time steps has fallen below 10(exp -5).