A comparison of cooling methods for the airframe nozzle of a single-stage-to-orbit aircraftA comparison is made between two different cooling schemes, including a complete system thermal analysis and weight accounting for each. A hydrogen-direct system operates at a higher pressure (34.5 Mpa) and greater temperature rise in the coolant. There is no temperature limit on the coolant itself and high injector temperatures may be achieved, but the pressure lines must be routed over great distances (10 m). The system is simple, and the coolant is almost weightless. In contrast, an indirect system operates at a lower pressure (3.8n MPa) and the liquid coolant has a much greater thermal capacity. The greater thermal capacity causes much less of a temperature rise in the coolant. The chosen coolant is Syltherm 800. This nontoxic fluid is compatible with any metal, including titanium. The loop requires a separate fuel/coolant heat exchanger and coolant pump. The indirect system offers some distinct safety advantages but is heavier than the direct hydrogen coolant system.
Document ID
19920035201
Acquisition Source
Legacy CDMS
Document Type
Conference Paper
Authors
Jones, Stuart C. (Lockheed Engineering and Sciences Co. Hampton, VA, United States)
Petley, Dennis H. (NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)