Comment on 'The effect of liquid water on thunderstorm charging' by C.P.R. Saunders et al

This paper is a comment on the claims made in the paper by Saunders et al. (1991), which reports on a laboratory simulation of ice particle charging in thunderstorms, concerning the microphysical condition of riming ice particles and the conditions for sublimation and negative charging in thunderclouds. It is argued that the interpretation of Saunders is contrary to the findings of Williams et al. (1991), which support the hypothesis that sublimating graupel charge negatively (in collision with smaller ice particles) and graupel in deposition charge positively. Based on microphysical calculations as well as observations in thunderclouds, it is concluded that, while sublimation of the rimer surface and negative charging do not appear to account for the laboratory observations reported by Saunders et al., these authors do not have sufficient evidence for rejecting the sublimation hypothesis presented by Williams et al. (1991) for thunderstorms.