Comparison of level-1 and level-2 buckling and postbuckling solutions

The accuracy of the solutions obtained with the Level-1 computational modules of DISDECO (Delft Interactive Shell Design Code) are investigated by comparing them with solutions obtained with ANILISA, a Level-2 computational module. Whereas the Level-1 solutions are based on the use of trigonometric functions to represent the out-of-plane displacement W and involve Galerkin type approximations to reduce the governing partial differential equations to simple algebraic expressions, the Level-2 solutions employ a truncated Fourier expansion in the circumferential direction and solve the resulting ordinary differential equations forming a nonlinear eigenvalue problem by a Stodola like technique. This involves the numerical integration of the set of ordinary differential equations, which in turn makes it possible to satisfy the specified boundary conditions exactly. It is shown that in many applications the Level-1 predictions concerning the critical buckling load of the perfect structure and its imperfection sensitivity are quite accurate and reliable. For those cases where this is not true, it is shown how the pre and postprocessing facilities of DISDECO can be used efficiently to arrive at a reliable prediction. This involves always the use of the Level-2 computational module ANILISA with its rigorous prebuckling solution and its feature which makes it possible to satisfy the specified boundary conditions exactly.