ROSAT observations of the supernova remnant 3C 400.2

We have used the ROSAT point source proportional counter (PSPC) to examine the X-ray emission from 3C 400.2, a supernova remnant (SNR) which is a member of a class of remnants with limb-brightened radio and centrally condensed X-ray morphologies. The X-ray emission fills the radio shell and is characterized by an interior peak in the northwest region of the remnant. Otherwise, the surface brightness has a relatively smooth distribution. The X-ray peak is not correlated with any radio features or with the observed optical filaments. The PSPC X-ray spectrum is not well fitted by a power-law model but can be described in terms of thermal emission from a hot plasma with solar abundances. The only point source along the line of sight to the SNR is associated with a bright foreground F8 star. Thus the X-ray emission from 3C 400.2 is unlikely to be due to synchrotron radiation from an active pulsar. If the emission arises from a thermal plasma and the absorbing column along the line of sight to 3C 400.2 is 7.8 x 10(exp 21)sq cm, then the temperature of the plasma is 0.27 keV, and the 0.4-2.4 keV X-ray luminosity is 1.3 x 10(exp 36) ergs/s for an assumed distance of 6 kpc. An X-ray hardness ratio map shows a slight increase in the hardness of the emission in the regions of the remnant with a higher X-ray surface brightness. Assuming uniform absorption across the remnant, this increase implies the temperature is approximately 1.5 times greater in the high surface brightness regions of SNR. The relatively uniform spectrum and the anticorrelation between X-ray and radio features seems to rule out the possibility that 3C 400.2 is actually two overlapping or interacting SNRs. The morphology of 3C 400.2 can be explained in terms of a multiphase interstellar medium (ISM) in which the primary shock is expanding into an ISM studded with dense cloudlets, if the clouds are evaporated or disrupted on a timescale which is long compared to the age of the SNR. It may also be possible to explain the emission in terms of the interaction of the SNR with a massive wind-driven shell, although the existing models for the evolution of A SNR in this environment suggest that the H-alpha luminosity should be much larger than the X-ray luminosity, which is not observed. We cannot completely rule out the possibility that 3C 400.2's appearance as a centrally peaked X-ray SNR is the result of an interaction between the remnant and a cloud along the line of sight, although this seems unlikely.