Potential for Sonic Boom Reduction of the 2.4-H5085 Arrow Wing HSCT

Preliminary human acceptability studies of sonic booms indicate that supersonic flight is unlikely to be acceptable even at noise levels significantly below 1994 low boom designs (reference 1, p. 288). Further, these low boom designs represent considerable changes to baseline configurations, and changes translate into additional effort and uncertain structural weight penalties that may provide no annoyance benefit, increasing the risk of including low boom technology. Since over land sonic boom designs were so risky (and yet the acceptability studies highlight how annoying sonic booms are), boom softening studies were undertaken to reduce the boom of baseline configurations using minor modifications that would not significantly change the designs. The goal of this work is to reduce boom levels over water. Even though Concorde over water boom has not been found to have any adverse environmental impact, boom levels for baseline HSCT designs are 50% higher in overpressure than the Concorde (due to a doubling in configuration weight with only a 50% increase in length),