NASA Logo

NTRS

NTRS - NASA Technical Reports Server

Back to Results
Analysis of the Performance Characteristics of the Five-Channel Microtops II Sun Photometer for Measuring Aerosol Optical Thickness and Precipitable Water VaporFive Microtops II sun photometers were studied in detail at the NASA Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC) to determine their performance in measuring aerosol optical thickness (AOT or Tau(sub alphalambda) and precipitable column water vapor (W). Each derives Tau(sub alphalambda) from measured signals at four wavelengths lambda (340, 440, 675, and 870 nm), and W from the 936 nm signal measurements. Accuracy of Tau(sub alphalambda) and W determination depends on the reliability of the relevant channel calibration coefficient (V(sub 0)). Relative calibration by transfer of parameters from a more accurate sun photometer (such as the Mauna-Loa-calibrated AERONET master sun photometer at GSFC) is more reliable than Langley calibration performed at GSFC. It was found that the factory-determined value of the instrument constant for the 936 nm filter (k= 0.7847) used in the Microtops' internal algorithm is unrealistic, causing large errors in V(sub 0(936)), Tau(sub alpha936), and W. Thus, when applied for transfer calibration at GSFC, whereas the random variation of V(aub 0) at 340 to 870 nm is quite small, with coefficients of variation (CV) in the range of 0 to 2.4%, at 936 nm the CV goes up to 19%. Also, the systematic temporal variation of V(sub 0) at 340 to 870 nm is very slow, while at 936 nm it is large and exhibits a very high dependence on W. The algorithm also computes Tau(sub alpha936) as 0.91Tau(sub alpha870), which is highly simplistic. Therefore, it is recommended to determine Tau(sub alpha936) by logarithmic extrapolation from Tau(sub alpha675) and Tau(sub alpha 870. From the operational standpoint of the Microtops, apart from errors that may result from unperceived cloud contamination, the main sources of error include inaccurate pointing to the Sun, neglecting to clean the front quartz window, and neglecting to calibrate correctly. If these three issues are adequately taken care of, the Microtops can be quite accurate and stable, with root mean square (rms) differences between corresponding retrievals from clean calibrated Microtops and the AERONET sun photometer being about +/-0.02 at 340 nm, decreasing down to about +/-0.01 at 870 nm.
Document ID
20020039724
Document Type
Preprint (Draft being sent to journal)
Authors
Ichoku, Charles (Science Systems and Applications, Inc. Lanham, MD United States)
Levy, Robert (Science Systems and Applications, Inc. Lanham, MD United States)
Kaufman, Yoram (NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt, MD United States)
Remer, Lorraine A. (NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt, MD United States)
Li, Rong-Rong (Science Systems and Applications, Inc. Lanham, MD United States)
Martins, Vanderlei J. (NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt, MD United States)
Holben, Brent N. (NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt, MD United States)
Abuhassan, Nader (Science Systems and Applications, Inc. Lanham, MD United States)
Slutsker, Ilya (Science Systems and Applications, Inc. Lanham, MD United States)
Eck, Thomas F. (NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt, MD United States)
Pietras, Christophe (Science Applications International Corp. Greenbelt, MD United States)
Lau, William K. M.
Date Acquired
August 20, 2013
Publication Date
January 1, 2001
Subject Category
Instrumentation and Photography
Distribution Limits
Public
Copyright
Work of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.
Document Inquiry