NASA Logo

NTRS

NTRS - NASA Technical Reports Server

Back to Results
Comparison of N2O Emissions from Soils at Three Temperate Agricultural SitesNitrous oxide (N2O) flux simulations by four models were compared with year-round field measurements from five temperate agricultural sites in three countries. The field sites included an unfertilized, semi-arid rangeland with low N2O fluxes in eastern Colorado, USA; two fertilizer treatments (urea and nitrate) on a fertilized grass ley cut for silage in Scotland; and two fertilized, cultivated crop fields in Germany where N2O loss during the winter was quite high. The models used were daily trace gas versions of the CENTURY model, DNDC, ExpertN, and the NASA-Ames version of the CASA model. These models included similar components (soil physics, decomposition, plant growth, and nitrogen transformations), but in some cases used very different algorithms for these processes. All models generated similar results for the general cycling of nitrogen through the agro-ecosystems, but simulated nitrogen trace gas fluxes were quite different. In most cases the simulated N20 fluxes were within a factor of about 2 of the observed annual fluxes, but even when models produced similar N2O fluxes they often produced very different estimates of gaseous N loss as nitric oxide (NO), dinitrogen (N2), and ammonia (NH3). Accurate simulation of soil moisture appears to be a key requirement for reliable simulation of N2O emissions. All models simulated the general pattern of low background fluxes with high fluxes following fertilization at the Scottish sites, but they could not (or were not designed to) accurately capture the observed effects of different fertilizer types on N2O flux. None of the models were able to reliably generate large pulses of N2O during brief winter thaws that were observed at the two German sites. All models except DNDC simulated very low N2O fluxes for the dry site in Colorado. The US Trace Gas Network (TRAGNET) has provided a mechanism for this model and site intercomparison. Additional intercomparisons are needed with these and other models and additional data sets; these should include both tropical agro-ecosystems and new agricultural management techniques designed for sustainability.
Document ID
20020050372
Acquisition Source
Ames Research Center
Document Type
Preprint (Draft being sent to journal)
Authors
Frolking, S. E.
(NASA Ames Research Center Moffett Field, CA United States)
Moiser, A. R.
(NASA Ames Research Center Moffett Field, CA United States)
Ojima, D. S.
(NASA Ames Research Center Moffett Field, CA United States)
Li, C.
(NASA Ames Research Center Moffett Field, CA United States)
Parton, W. J.
(NASA Ames Research Center Moffett Field, CA United States)
Potter, C. S.
(NASA Ames Research Center Moffett Field, CA United States)
Priesack, E.
(NASA Ames Research Center Moffett Field, CA United States)
Stenger, R.
(NASA Ames Research Center Moffett Field, CA United States)
Haberbosch, C.
(NASA Ames Research Center Moffett Field, CA United States)
Dorsch, P.
(NASA Ames Research Center Moffett Field, CA United States)
Peterson, David L.
Date Acquired
August 20, 2013
Publication Date
January 1, 1997
Subject Category
Environment Pollution
Distribution Limits
Public
Copyright
Work of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.

Available Downloads

There are no available downloads for this record.
No Preview Available