Self-Consistent Model of Magnetospheric Ring Current and Propagating Electromagnetic Ion Cyclotron Waves

This paper is dedicated to further presentations and discussions of the results from our new global self-consistent theoretical model of interacting ring current ions and electromagnetic ion cyclotron waves [Khazanov et al., 2006; here referred to as Paper 1]. In order to adequately take into account the wave propagation and refraction in a multi-ion plasmasphere, we explicitly include the ray tracing equations in our previous self-consistent model and use the general form of the wave kinetic equation [for details see Paper 1]. To demonstrate the effects of the EMIC wave propagation and refraction on the RC proton precipitations and heating of the thermal plasmaspheric electrons we simulate the May 1998 storm. The main findings of our simulation can be summarized as follows. Firstly, the wave induced precipitations have a quite fine structure, and are highly organized by location of the plasmapause gradient. The strongest fluxes of about 4 (raised dot) 10(exp 6) [(cm (raised dot) s (raised dot) sr)(sup -l)] are observed during the main and early recovery phases of the storm. The very interesting and probably more important finding is that in a number of cases the most intense precipitating fluxes are not simply connected to the most intense EMIC waves. The character of the EMIC wave power spectral density distribution over the equatorial wave normal angle is an extremely crucial for the effectiveness of the RC ion scattering. Secondly, comparison of the global proton precipitating patterns with the results from other ring current model [Kozyra et al., 1997] reveals that although we observe a qualitative agreement between localizations of the wave induced fluxes in the models, there is no quantitative agreement between the magnitudes of these fluxes. These differences are mainly due to a qualitative difference between the characters of the EMIC wave power spectral density distributions over the equatorial wave normal angle. Finally, the two energy sources to the plasmaspheric electrons are considered; (i) the heat fluxes caused by the EMIC wave energy absorption due to Landau resonance, and (ii) the heat fluxes due to Coulomb energy degradation of the RC o(+) ions. The heat fluxes caused by the EMIC wave energy absorption due to Landau resonance are observed in the postnoon-premidnight MLT sector, and maximize at the magnitude of 10l1 (eV/(cm(sup 2)(raised dot) s) at L=3.25, MLT=22 at 3400 UT after 1 May, 0000 UT. The greatest Coulomb energy deposition rates are about 2 (raised dot) 10(sup 10)(eV/(cm(sup 2)(raised dot) s) and observed during two periods; 32-48 hours, and 76-86 hours after 1 May, 0000 UT. The theoretically derived spatial structure of the thermal electron heating caused by interaction of the RC with plasmasphere is strongly supported by concurrent and conjugate plasma measurements from the plasmasphere, the RC, and the topside ionosphere [Gurgiolo et al., 20051.