Tilt and Translation Motion Perception during Pitch Tilt with Visual Surround Translation

The central nervous system must resolve the ambiguity of inertial motion sensory cues in order to derive an accurate representation of spatial orientation. Previous studies suggest that multisensory integration is critical for discriminating linear accelerations arising from tilt and translation head motion. Visual input is especially important at low frequencies where canal input is declining. The NASA Tilt Translation Device (TTD) was designed to recreate postflight orientation disturbances by exposing subjects to matching tilt self motion with conflicting visual surround translation. Previous studies have demonstrated that brief exposures to pitch tilt with foreaft visual surround translation produced changes in compensatory vertical eye movement responses, postural equilibrium, and motion sickness symptoms. Adaptation appeared greatest with visual scene motion leading (versus lagging) the tilt motion, and the adaptation time constant appeared to be approximately 30 min. The purpose of this study was to compare motion perception when the visual surround translation was inphase versus outofphase with pitch tilt. The inphase stimulus presented visual surround motion one would experience if the linear acceleration was due to foreaft self translation within a stationary surround, while the outofphase stimulus had the visual scene motion leading the tilt by 90 deg as previously used. The tilt stimuli in these conditions were asymmetrical, ranging from an upright orientation to 10 deg pitch back. Another objective of the study was to compare motion perception with the inphase stimulus when the tilts were asymmetrical relative to upright (0 to 10 deg back) versus symmetrical (10 deg forward to 10 deg back). Twelve subjects (6M, 6F, 22-55 yrs) were tested during 3 sessions separated by at least one week. During each of the three sessions (out-of-phase asymmetrical, in-phase asymmetrical, inphase symmetrical), subjects were exposed to visual surround translation synchronized with pitch tilt at 0.1 Hz for a total of 30 min. Tilt and translation motion perception was obtained from verbal reports and a joystick mounted on a linear stage. Horizontal vergence and vertical eye movements were obtained with a binocular video system. Responses were also obtained during darkness before and following 15 min and 30 min of visual surround translation. Each of the three stimulus conditions involving visual surround translation elicited a significantly reduced sense of perceived tilt and strong linear vection (perceived translation) compared to pre-exposure tilt stimuli in darkness. This increase in perceived translation with reduction in tilt perception was also present in darkness following 15 and 30 min exposures, provided the tilt stimuli were not interrupted. Although not significant, there was a trend for the inphase asymmetrical stimulus to elicit a stronger sense of both translation and tilt than the out-of-phase asymmetrical stimulus. Surprisingly, the inphase asymmetrical stimulus also tended to elicit a stronger sense of peak-to-peak translation than the inphase symmetrical stimulus, even though the range of linear acceleration during the symmetrical stimulus was twice that of the asymmetrical stimulus. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that the central nervous system resolves the ambiguity of inertial motion sensory cues by integrating inputs from visual, vestibular, and somatosensory systems.