Record Details

Performance Comparison Between a Head-Worn Display System and a Head-Up Display for Low Visibility Commercial Operations
NTRS Full-Text: Click to View  [PDF Size: 251 KB]
Author and Affiliation:
Arthur, Jarvis J., III(NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA, United States);
Prinzel, Lawrence J., III(NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA, United States);
Barnes, James R.(Booz-Allen and Hamilton, Inc., Engineering Services, Hampton, VA, United States);
Williams, Steven P.(NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA, United States);
Jones, Denise R.(NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA, United States);
Harrison, Stephanie J.(Old Dominion Univ., Norfolk, VA, United States);
Bailey, Randall E.(NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA, United States)
Abstract: Research, development, test, and evaluation of flight deck interface technologies is being conducted by NASA to proactively identify, develop, and mature tools, methods, and technologies for improving overall aircraft safety of new and legacy vehicles operating in Next Generation Air Transportation System (NextGen). Under the Vehicle Systems Safety Technologies (VSST) project in the Aviation Safety Program, one specific area of research is the use of small Head-Worn Displays (HWDs) as an equivalent display to a Head-Up Display (HUD). Title 14 of the US Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 91.175 describes a possible operational credit which can be obtained with airplane equipage of a HUD or an "equivalent" display combined with Enhanced Vision (EV). If successful, a HWD may provide the same safety and operational benefits as current HUD-equipped aircraft but for significantly more aircraft in which HUD installation is neither practical nor possible. A simulation experiment was conducted to evaluate if the HWD, coupled with a head-tracker, can provide an equivalent display to a HUD. Comparative testing was performed in the Research Flight Deck (RFD) Cockpit Motion Facility (CMF) full mission, motion-based simulator at NASA Langley. Twelve airline crews conducted approach and landing, taxi, and departure operations during low visibility operations (1000' Runway Visual Range (RVR), 300' RVR) at Memphis International Airport (Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) identifier: KMEM). The results showed that there were no statistical differences in the crews performance in terms of touchdown and takeoff. Further, there were no statistical differences between the HUD and HWD in pilots' responses to questionnaires.
Publication Date: May 05, 2014
Document ID:
20140006168
(Acquired May 30, 2014)
Subject Category: AIR TRANSPORTATION AND SAFETY
Report/Patent Number: NF1676L-17438
Document Type: Conference Paper
Meeting Information: SPIE DSS Head- and Helmet-Mounted Displays XIV: Design and Applications; 5-9 May 2014; Baltimore, MD; United States
Meeting Sponsor: International Society for Optical Engineering; Bellingham, WA, United States
Contract/Grant/Task Num: WBS 284848.02.03.07.01
Financial Sponsor: NASA Langley Research Center; Hampton, VA, United States
Description: 17p; In English; Original contains color and black and white illustrations
Distribution Limits: Unclassified; Publicly available; Unlimited
Rights: Copyright; Distribution as joint owner in the copyright
NASA Terms: ENHANCED VISION; LOW VISIBILITY; AIRCRAFT SAFETY; COMMERCIAL AIRCRAFT; DISPLAY DEVICES; FLIGHT TESTS; HEAD-UP DISPLAYS; SIMULATION; RUNWAYS; TAKEOFF; TOUCHDOWN
› Back to Top
Facebook icon, External Link to NASA STI page on Facebook Twitter icon, External Link to NASA STI on Twitter YouTube icon, External Link to NASA STI Channel on YouTube RSS icon, External Link to New NASA STI RSS Feed
Find Similar Records
 
NASA Logo, External Link

NASA Official: Gerald Steeman

Sponsored By: NASA Scientific and Technical Information Program

Site Curator: STI Support Services

Last Modified: May 30, 2014

Privacy Policy & Important Notices Disclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use Freedom of Information Act USA.gov NASA.gov NASA OCIO Free Adobe PDF Reader Free MS Word Viewer