NASA Logo

NTRS

NTRS - NASA Technical Reports Server

Back to Results
Hazard Assessment from Storm Tides and Rainfall on a Tidal River EstuaryHere, we report on methods and results for a model-based flood hazard assessment we have conducted for the Hudson River from New York City to Troy/Albany at the head of tide. Our recent work showed that neglecting freshwater flows leads to underestimation of peak water levels at up-river sites and neglecting stratification (typical with two-dimensional modeling) leads to underestimation all along the Hudson. As a result, we use a three-dimensional hydrodynamic model and merge streamflows and storm tides from tropical and extratropical cyclones (TCs, ETCs), as well as wet extratropical cyclone (WETC) floods (e.g. freshets, rain-on-snow events). We validate the modeled flood levels and quantify error with comparisons to 76 historical events. A Bayesian statistical method is developed for tropical cyclone streamflows using historical data and consisting in the evaluation of (1) the peak discharge and its pdf as a function of TC characteristics, and (2) the temporal trend of the hydrograph as a function of temporal evolution of the cyclone track, its intensity and the response characteristics of the specific basin. A k-nearest-neighbors method is employed to determine the hydrograph shape. Out of sample validation tests demonstrate the effectiveness of the method. Thus, the combined effects of storm surge and runoff produced by tropical cyclones hitting the New York area can be included in flood hazard assessment. Results for the upper Hudson (Albany) suggest a dominance of WETCs, for the lower Hudson (at New York Harbor) a case where ETCs are dominant for shorter return periods and TCs are more important for longer return periods (over 150 years), and for the middle-Hudson (Poughkeepsie) a mix of all three flood events types is important. However, a possible low-bias for TC flood levels is inferred from a lower importance in the assessment results, versus historical event top-20 lists, and this will be further evaluated as these preliminary methods and results are finalized. Future funded work will quantify the influences of sea level rise and flood adaptation plans (e.g. surge barriers). It would also be valuable to examine how streamflows from tropical cyclones and wet cool-season storms will change, as this factor will dominate at upriver locations.
Document ID
20150021054
Acquisition Source
Goddard Space Flight Center
Document Type
Conference Paper
Authors
Orton, P.
(Stevens Inst. of Tech. Hoboken, NJ, United States)
Conticello, F.
(Rome II Univ. Rome, Italy)
Cioffi, F.
(Rome II Univ. Rome, Italy)
Hall, T.
(NASA Goddard Inst. for Space Studies New York, NY United States)
Georgas, N.
(Stevens Inst. of Tech. Hoboken, NJ, United States)
Lall, U.
(Columbia Univ. New York, NY, United States)
Blumberg, A.
(Stevens Inst. of Tech. Hoboken, NJ, United States)
Date Acquired
November 10, 2015
Publication Date
June 28, 2015
Subject Category
Geosciences (General)
Meteorology And Climatology
Report/Patent Number
GSFC-E-DAA-TN24935
Report Number: GSFC-E-DAA-TN24935
Meeting Information
Meeting: International Association for Hydro-Environment Engineering and Research (IAHR) World Congress
Location: The Hague
Country: Netherlands
Start Date: June 28, 2015
End Date: July 3, 2015
Sponsors: International Association for Hydro-Environment Engineering and Research (IAHR)
Funding Number(s)
CONTRACT_GRANT: NSF CNS-0958217
CONTRACT_GRANT: NSF CNS-0958379
CONTRACT_GRANT: ACI-1126113
WBS: WBS 509496.01.08.04.24
Distribution Limits
Public
Copyright
Public Use Permitted.
Keywords
Hazard assessment
Tropical cyclones
Hydrodynamic model
Hudson River
New York
No Preview Available