NASA Logo

NTRS

NTRS - NASA Technical Reports Server

Back to Results
Solar vs. Fission Surface Power for MarsA multi-discipline team of experts from the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) developed Mars surface power system point design solutions for two conceptual missions. The primary goal of this study was to compare the relative merits of solar- versus fission-powered versions of each surface mission. First, the team compared three different solar power options against a fission power system concept for a sub-scale, uncrewed demonstration mission. The 4.5 meter (m) diameter pathfinder lander's primary mission would be to demonstrate Mars entry, descent, and landing techniques. Once on the Martian surface, the lander's In Situ Resource Utilization (ISRU) payload would demonstrate liquid oxygen propellant production using atmospheric resources. For the purpose of this exercise, location was assumed to be at the Martian equator. The three solar concepts considered included a system that only operated during daylight hours (at roughly half the daily propellant production rate of a round-the-clock fission design), a battery-augmented system that operated through the night (matching the fission concept's propellant production rate), and a system that operated only during daylight, but at a higher rate (again, matching the fission concept's propellant production rate). Including 30% mass growth allowance, total payload masses for the three solar concepts ranged from 1,116 to 2,396 kg, versus the 2,686 kg fission power scheme. However, solar power masses are expected to approach or exceed the fission payload mass at landing sites further from the equator, making landing site selection a key driver in the final power system decision. The team also noted that detailed reliability analysis should be performed on daytime-only solar power schemes to assess potential issues with frequent ISRU system on/off cycling. Next, the team developed a solar-powered point design solution for a conceptual four-crew, 500-day surface mission consisting of up to four landers per crewed expedition mission. Unlike the demonstration mission, a lengthy power outage due to the global dust storms that are known to occur on Mars would pose a safety hazard to a crewed mission. A similar fission versus solar power trade study performed by NASA in 2007 concluded that fission power was more reliable-with a much lower mass penalty-than solar power for this application. However, recent advances in solar cell and energy storage technologies and changes in operational assumptions prompted NASA to revisit the analysis. For the purpose of this exercise a particular landing site at Jezero Crater, located at 18o north latitude, was assumed. A fission power system consisting of four each 10 kW Kilopower fission reactors was compared to a distributed network of Orion-derived Ultraflex solar arrays and Lithium ion batteries mounted on every lander. The team found that a solar power system mass of about 9,800 kg would provide the 22 kilowatts (kW) keep-alive power needed to survive a dust storm lasting up to 120-days at average optical depth of 5, and 35 kW peak power for normal operations under clear skies. Although this is less than half the mass estimated during the 2007 work (which assumed latitudes up to 30o) it is still more than the 7,000 kg mass of the fission system which provides full power regardless of dust storm conditions.
Document ID
20160002628
Acquisition Source
Johnson Space Center
Document Type
Conference Paper
Authors
Rucker, Michelle A.
(NASA Johnson Space Center Houston, TX, United States)
Oleson, Steve
(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)
George, Pat
(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)
Landis, Geoffrey A.
(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)
Fincannon, James
(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)
Bogner, Amee
(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)
Jones, Robert E.
(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)
Turnbull, Elizabeth
(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)
Martini, Michael C.
(Zin Technologies, Inc. Cleveland, OH, United States)
Gyekenyesi, John Z.
(Zin Technologies, Inc. Cleveland, OH, United States)
Colozza, Anthony J.
(Vantage Partners, LLC Brook Park, OH, United States)
Schmitz, Paul C.
(Vantage Partners, LLC Brook Park, OH, United States)
Packard, Thomas W.
(Vantage Partners, LLC Brook Park, OH, United States)
Date Acquired
March 1, 2016
Publication Date
September 13, 2016
Subject Category
Spacecraft Propulsion And Power
Astrodynamics
Report/Patent Number
JSC-CN-35576
Meeting Information
Meeting: AIAA Space 2016
Location: Pasadena, CA
Country: United States
Start Date: September 13, 2016
End Date: September 16, 2016
Sponsors: American Inst. of Aeronautics and Astronautics
Distribution Limits
Public
Copyright
Public Use Permitted.
No Preview Available