NASA Logo

NTRS

NTRS - NASA Technical Reports Server

Back to Results
Global and Regional Radiative Forcing from 20 Reductions in BC, OC and SO4 an HTAP2 Multi-Model StudyIn the Hemispheric Transport of Air Pollution Phase 2 (HTAP2) exercise, a range of global atmospheric general circulation and chemical transport models performed coordinated perturbation experiments with 20% reductions in emissions of anthropogenic aerosols, or aerosol precursors, in a number of source regions. Here, we compare the resulting changes in the atmospheric load and vertically resolved profiles of black carbon (BC), organic aerosols (OA) and sulfate (SO4/ from 10 models that include treatment of aerosols. We use a set of temporally, horizontally and vertically resolved profiles of aerosol forcing efficiency (AFE) to estimate the impact of emission changes in six major source regions on global radiative forcing (RF) pertaining to the direct aerosol effect, finding values between. 51.9 and 210.8mW/sq m/Tg for BC, between -2.4 and -17.9mW/sq m/Tg for OA and between -3.6 and -10.3W/sq m/Tg for SO4. In most cases, the local influence dominates, but results show that mitigations in south and east Asia have substantial impacts on the radiative budget in all investigated receptor regions, especially for BC. In Russia and the Middle East, more than 80 % of the forcing for BC and OA is due to extra-regional emission reductions. Similarly, for North America, BC emissions control in east Asia is found to be more important than domestic mitigations, which is consistent with previous findings. Comparing fully resolved RF calculations to RF estimates based on vertically averaged AFE profiles allows us to quantify the importance of vertical resolution to RF estimates. We find that locally in the source regions, a 20% emission reduction strengthens the radiative forcing associated with SO4 by 25% when including the vertical dimension, as the AFE for SO4 is strongest near the surface. Conversely, the local RF from BC weakens by 37% since BC AFE is low close to the ground. The fraction of BC direct effect forcing attributable to intercontinental transport, on the other hand, is enhanced by one-third when accounting for the vertical aspect, because long-range transport primarily leads to aerosol changes at high altitudes, where the BC AFE is strong. While the surface temperature response may vary with the altitude of aerosol change, the analysis in the present study is not extended to estimates of temperature or precipitation changes.
Document ID
20170003436
Acquisition Source
Goddard Space Flight Center
Document Type
Reprint (Version printed in journal)
Authors
Stjern, Camilla Weum
(Center for International Climate and Environmental Research Oslo, Norway)
Samset, Bjorn Hallvard
(Center for International Climate and Environmental Research Oslo, Norway)
Myhre, Gunnar
(Center for International Climate and Environmental Research Oslo, Norway)
Bian, Huisheng
(Maryland Univ. Baltimore County Baltimore, MD, United States)
Chin, Mian
(NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt, MD United States)
Davila, Yanko
(Colorado Univ. Boulder, CO, United States)
Dentener, Frank
(Joint Research Centre of the European Communities Ispra, Italy)
Emmons, Louisa
(National Center for Atmospheric Research Boulder, CO, United States)
Flemming, Johannes
(European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts Reading, United Kingdom)
Haslerud, Amund Sovde
(Center for International Climate and Environmental Research Oslo, Norway)
Henze, Daven
(Colorado Univ. Boulder, CO, United States)
Jonson, Jan Eiof
(Norwegian Meteorological Inst. Oslo, Norway)
Kucsera, Tom
(Universities Space Research Association Greenbelt, MD, United States)
Lund, Marianne Tronstad
(Center for International Climate and Environmental Research Oslo, Norway)
Schulz, Michael
(Norwegian Meteorological Inst. Oslo, Norway)
Sudo, Kengo
(Nagoya Univ. Nagoya, Japan)
Takemura, Toshihiko
(Kyushu Univ. Fukuoka, Japan)
Tilmes, Simone
(National Center for Atmospheric Research Boulder, CO, United States)
Date Acquired
April 14, 2017
Publication Date
November 1, 2016
Publication Information
Publication: Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
Publisher: Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
Volume: 16
Issue: 21
ISSN: 1680-7324
Subject Category
Geosciences (General)
Environment Pollution
Report/Patent Number
GSFC-E-DAA-TN41573
Funding Number(s)
CONTRACT_GRANT: NNX15AT34A
CONTRACT_GRANT: NNG11HP16A
Distribution Limits
Public
Copyright
Other
Keywords
profiles of aerosol forcing efficiency (AFE)
altitude of aerosol change

Available Downloads

There are no available downloads for this record.
No Preview Available