NASA Logo

NTRS

NTRS - NASA Technical Reports Server

Back to Results
Implications of Climate Mitigation for Future Agricultural ProductionClimate change is projected to negatively impact biophysical agricultural productivity in much of the world. Actions taken to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and mitigate future climate changes, are thus of central importance for agricultural production. Climate impacts are, however, not unidirectional; some crops in some regions (primarily higher latitudes) are projected to benefit, particularly if increased atmospheric carbon dioxide is assumed to strongly increase crop productivity at large spatial and temporal scales. Climate mitigation measures that are implemented by reducing atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations lead to reductions both in the strength of climate change and in the benefits of carbon dioxide fertilization. Consequently, analysis of the effects of climate mitigation on agricultural productivity must address not only regions for which mitigation is likely to reduce or even reverse climate damages. There are also regions that are likely to see increased crop yields due to climate change, which may lose these added potentials under mitigation action. Comparing data from the most comprehensive archive of crop yield projections publicly available, we find that climate mitigation leads to overall benefits from avoided damages at the global scale and especially in many regions that are already at risk of food insecurity today. Ignoring controversial carbon dioxide fertilization effects on crop productivity, we find that for the median projection aggressive mitigation could eliminate approximately 81% of the negative impacts of climate change on biophysical agricultural productivity globally by the end of the century. In this case, the benefits of mitigation typically extend well into temperate regions, but vary by crop and underlying climate model projections. Should large benefits to crop yields from carbon dioxide fertilization be realized, the effects of mitigation become much more mixed, though still positive globally and beneficial in many food insecure countries.
Document ID
20170005253
Acquisition Source
Goddard Space Flight Center
Document Type
Reprint (Version printed in journal)
Authors
Mueller, Christoph
(Potsdam-Inst. fuer Klimafolgenforschung Potsdam, Germany)
Elliott, Joshua
(Chicago Univ. Chicago, IL, United States)
Chryssanthacopoulos, James
(Columbia Univ. New York, NY, United States)
Deryng, Delphine
(East Anglia Univ. Norwich, United Kingdom)
Folberth, Christian
(International Inst. for Applied Systems Analysis Laxenburg, Austria)
Pugh, Thomas A. M.
(Karlsruhe Inst. fuer Technologie Karlsruhe, Germany)
Schmid, Erwin
(University for Natural Resources and Applied Life Sciences Vienna, Austria)
Date Acquired
June 7, 2017
Publication Date
November 25, 2015
Publication Information
Publication: Environmental Research Letters
Publisher: IOP Publishing
Volume: 10
Issue: 12
e-ISSN: 1748-9326
Subject Category
Meteorology And Climatology
Report/Patent Number
GSFC-E-DAA-TN28485
Funding Number(s)
CONTRACT_GRANT: 603542 LUC4C
CONTRACT_GRANT: BMBF 01LN1317A
CONTRACT_GRANT: 282672 EMBRACE
CONTRACT_GRANT: NNX14AB99A
Distribution Limits
Public
Copyright
Other

Available Downloads

There are no available downloads for this record.
No Preview Available