NASA Logo

NTRS

NTRS - NASA Technical Reports Server

Back to Results
Modeling for Battery PrognosticsFor any battery-powered vehicles (be it unmanned aerial vehicles, small passenger aircraft, or assets in exoplanetary operations) to operate at maximum efficiency and reliability, it is critical to monitor battery health as well performance and to predict end of discharge (EOD) and end of useful life (EOL). To fulfil these needs, it is important to capture the battery's inherent characteristics as well as operational knowledge in the form of models that can be used by monitoring, diagnostic, and prognostic algorithms. Several battery modeling methodologies have been developed in last few years as the understanding of underlying electrochemical mechanics has been advancing. The models can generally be classified as empirical models, electrochemical engineering models, multi-physics models, and molecular/atomist. Empirical models are based on fitting certain functions to past experimental data, without making use of any physicochemical principles. Electrical circuit equivalent models are an example of such empirical models. Electrochemical engineering models are typically continuum models that include electrochemical kinetics and transport phenomena. Each model has its advantages and disadvantages. The former type of model has the advantage of being computationally efficient, but has limited accuracy and robustness, due to the approximations used in developed model, and as a result of such approximations, cannot represent aging well. The latter type of model has the advantage of being very accurate, but is often computationally inefficient, having to solve complex sets of partial differential equations, and thus not suited well for online prognostic applications. In addition both multi-physics and atomist models are computationally expensive hence are even less suited to online application An electrochemistry-based model of Li-ion batteries has been developed, that captures crucial electrochemical processes, captures effects of aging, is computationally efficient, and is of suitable accuracy for reliable EOD prediction in a variety of operational profiles. The model can be considered an electrochemical engineering model, but unlike most such models found in the literature, certain approximations are done that allow to retain computational efficiency for online implementation of the model. Although the focus here is on Li-ion batteries, the model is quite general and can be applied to different chemistries through a change of model parameter values. Progress on model development, providing model validation results and EOD prediction results is being presented.
Document ID
20180000584
Acquisition Source
Ames Research Center
Document Type
Conference Paper
Authors
Kulkarni, Chetan S.
(SGT, Inc. Moffett Field, CA, United States)
Goebel, Kai
(NASA Ames Research Center Moffett Field, CA, United States)
Khasin, Michael
(SGT, Inc. Moffett Field, CA, United States)
Hogge, Edward
(Analytical Mechanics Associates, Inc. Hampton, VA, United States)
Quach, Patrick
(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)
Date Acquired
January 17, 2018
Publication Date
November 14, 2017
Subject Category
Electronics And Electrical Engineering
Energy Production And Conversion
Report/Patent Number
ARC-E-DAA-TN49257
Meeting Information
Meeting: NASA Aerospace Battery Workshop
Location: Huntsville, AL
Country: United States
Start Date: November 14, 2017
End Date: November 16, 2017
Sponsors: NASA Marshall Space Flight Center
Funding Number(s)
CONTRACT_GRANT: NNA14AA60C
CONTRACT_GRANT: 80LARC17C0003
CONTRACT_GRANT: IPA08-NA
Distribution Limits
Public
Copyright
Public Use Permitted.
Keywords
Prognostics
RU
EOD
Li-ion batteries
No Preview Available