NASA Logo

NTRS

NTRS - NASA Technical Reports Server

Back to Results
On the Ability of Space- Based Passive and Active Remote Sensing Observations of CO2 to Detect Flux Perturbations to the Carbon CycleSpace-borne observations of CO2 are vital to gaining understanding of the carbon cycle in regions of the world that are difficult to measure directly, such as the tropical terrestrial biosphere, the high northern and southern latitudes, and in developing nations such as China. Measurements from passive instruments such as GOSAT (Greenhouse Gases Observing Satellite) and OCO-2 (Orbiting Carbon Observatory 2), however, are constrained by solar zenith angle limitations as well as sensitivity to the presence of clouds and aerosols. Active measurements such as those in development for the Active Sensing of CO2 Emissions over Nights, Days and Seasons (ASCENDS) mission show strong potential for making measurements in the high-latitude winter and in cloudy regions. In this work we examine the enhanced flux constraint provided by the improved coverage from an active measurement such as ASCENDS. The simulation studies presented here show that with sufficient precision, ASCENDS will detect permafrost thaw and fossil fuel emissions shifts at annual and seasonal time scales, even in the presence of transport errors, representativeness errors, and biogenic flux errors. While OCO-2 can detect some of these perturbations at the annual scale, the seasonal sampling provided by ASCENDS provides the stronger constraint. Plain Language Summary: Active and passive remote sensors show the potential to provide unprecedented information on the carbon cycle. With the all-season sampling, active remote sensors are more capable of constraining high-latitude emissions. The reduced sensitivity to cloud and aerosol also makes active sensors more capable of providing information in cloudy and polluted scenes with sufficient accuracy. These experiments account for errors that are fundamental to the top-down approach for constraining emissions, and even including these sources of error, we show that satellite remote sensors are critical for understanding the carbon cycle.
Document ID
20180002924
Acquisition Source
Goddard Space Flight Center
Document Type
Reprint (Version printed in journal)
External Source(s)
Authors
Crowell, Sean M. R.
(Oklahoma Univ. Norman, OK, United States)
Kawa, S. Randolph
(NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt, MD, United States)
Browell, Edward V.
(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)
Hammerling, Dorit M.
(National Center for Atmospheric Research Boulder, CO, United States)
Moore, Berrien
(Oklahoma Univ. Norman, OK, United States)
Schaefer, Kevin
(Colorado Univ. Boulder, CO, United States)
Doney, Scott C.
(Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution MA, United States)
Date Acquired
May 16, 2018
Publication Date
January 29, 2018
Publication Information
Publication: Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
Publisher: Wiley Publishing for American Geophysical Union
Volume: 123
Issue: 2
ISSN: 2169-897X
e-ISSN: 2169-8996
Subject Category
Earth Resources And Remote Sensing
Environment Pollution
Report/Patent Number
GSFC-E-DAA-TN55745
Funding Number(s)
CONTRACT_GRANT: GSFC-606.2-GRAN
CONTRACT_GRANT: NNX15AH13G
CONTRACT_GRANT: NNX15AJ27G
Distribution Limits
Public
Copyright
Other
Keywords
tropical terrestrial biosphere
the high northern and southern latitudes

Available Downloads

There are no available downloads for this record.
No Preview Available