NASA Logo

NTRS

NTRS - NASA Technical Reports Server

Back to Results
Comparison of Design Tools for Stress Analysis of Adhesively Bonded JointsAnalytical or semi-analytical models for stress analysis have long been a part of initial adhesive bond design and sizing. Even with the rise of general finite element software and methods, these design models have still remained a preferred method for fast and simple joint analysis. While these methods can yield fairly representative results, the models are constructed on the foundation of geometrical and material simplifications or assumptions that allow closed form or semi-closed form solutions. This study outlines the major differences in basic assumptions for three common design software packages under use at NASA, and shows the ramifications these assumptions in a few exemplar bonded joints.
Document ID
20190027612
Acquisition Source
Glenn Research Center
Document Type
Technical Memorandum (TM)
Authors
Stapleton, Scott
(Massachusetts Univ. Lowell, MA, United States)
Stier, Bertram
(Collier Research Corp. Newport News, VA, United States)
Jones, Stephen
(Collier Research Corp. Newport News, VA, United States)
Bergan, Andrew C.
(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)
Sleight, David W.
(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)
Bednarcyk, Brett A.
(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)
Zahn, Alana
(National Inst. of Aerospace Hampton, VA, United States)
Farrokh, Babak
(NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt, MD, United States)
Segal, Kenneth N.
(NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt, MD, United States)
Date Acquired
July 23, 2019
Publication Date
June 1, 2019
Subject Category
Structural Mechanics
Report/Patent Number
GRC-E-DAA-TN65210
NASA/TM2019-220210
Funding Number(s)
WBS: 228556.04.03.15
CONTRACT_GRANT: NNC12BA01B
CONTRACT_GRANT: NNL09AA00A
Distribution Limits
Public
Copyright
Public Use Permitted.
Keywords
Composites
Bonded Joints
finite element analysis
No Preview Available